House plant growing · Michigan

Hazel Park

Hazel Park, MI · ~25 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.7
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Hazel Park runs at 83% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical House plant growing workplace, earning a grade C.

Hazel Park: 3.7 TCR = 83% of House plant growing BLS 4.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Hazel Park safety composite

Hazel Park scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

68/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.74 per 100 workers

Safer than 64% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Hazel Park held a steady TCR band

Hazel Park's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2022 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 11.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=0.0 · 2023=11.2 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 111422 · Hazel Park, MI AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.7 · 83% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #13/28
  • PHOTO Terra Nova Nurseries…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~25 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Terra Nova Nurseries, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Hazel Park in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Hazel Park averages 3.7 TCR (83% of the House plant growing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Hazel Park TCR series: 2022=0 · 2023=11.2 · 2024=0 · BLS 4.5

Where Hazel Park falls in its industry

166 House plant growing establishments

Safer than 64% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #13 safest of 28 House plant growing employers in Michigan.

Hazel Park (25 employees, TCR 3.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 5.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Hazel Park
Hazel Park (25 employees, TCR 3.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 5.5

Hazel Park has fewer employees than the House plant growing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 11.2 11.2 2 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

111422 · MI · Hazel Park

166 House plant growing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 26 employers in Hazel Park, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Terra Nova Nurseries, Inc. 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR George Didden Greenhouse 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dan Schantz Greenhouse (Pipersville, PA) 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dan Schantz Greenhouse (Rising Sun, MD) 3.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bayside Best Beans LLC. 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tri-County Electric- Blanchard 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wastewater Treatment Plant 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bossman Construction Co LLC 25 FTE
CITY-NEAR AMZL : DDT1 1,632 FTE
CITY-NEAR Dakkota Integrated systems LLC 492 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - SMI1 431 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - DDT1 328 FTE
NAT-TCR Quench USA 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Diverse Building Solutions, Inc. 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Tedd Wood 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Linfor, Inc 3.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE D-Lux Screen Printing 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sletten Construction of Wyoming Inc 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Stamford Windustrial CO 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Colfax 25 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.