Control valves, fluid power, manufacturing · South Carolina

Danfoss Power Solutions US

Name: Danfoss Power Solutions US Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Easley, SC · ~297 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

B
Good Safety Record: 2.3
Avg TCR: 3.3
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Danfoss Power Solutions US runs at 70% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Control valves, fluid power, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Danfoss Power Solutions US: 2.3 TCR = 70% of Control valves, fluid power, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Danfoss Power Solutions US safety composite

Danfoss Power Solutions US scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 38%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

44/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): D 2.31 per 100 workers

Safer than 45% of industry peers
DART rate: D 1.29 per 100 workers

Safer than 38% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Danfoss Power Solutions US held a steady TCR band

Danfoss Power Solutions US's TCR held near 0.1 from 2.4 in 2022 to 2.3 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 2.4 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.56× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=2.4 · 2023=2.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332912 · Easley, SC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.3 · 70% of ind

DART 1.3 DART
RANK #4/4
PHOTO SSP Fittings Corp.
BOOK 2y book
INJ 12 inj
SIZE ~297 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SSP Fittings Corp. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

SSP Fittings C

2.4
Hilite Interna

2.4
Hays Fluid Con

2.4
This site

2.3
Foster Manufac

2.2

What this shows Danfoss Power Solutions US averages 2.3 TCR (70% of the Control valves, fluid power, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Danfoss Power Solutions US TCR series: 2022=2.4 · 2023=2.3 · BLS 3.3

Where Danfoss Power Solutions US falls in its industry

182 Control valves, fluid power, m establishments

Safer than 45% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.1.

Grade B

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 4 Control valves, fluid power, m employers in South Carolina.

Danfoss Power Solutions US (297 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 88 employees and a TCR of 2.1

Danfoss Power Solutions US has more employees than the Control valves, fluid power, manufacturi median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries	Illnesses	Fatalities
2023	2.3	1.3	6	1	0
2022	2.4	0.6	6	2	0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332912 · SC · Easley

182 Control valves, fluid power, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 56 employers in Easley, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	SSP Fittings Corp.	TWINSBURG, OH	2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Hilite International Orion	ORION, MI	2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Hays Fluid Controls	DALLAS, NC	2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Foster Manufacturing LLC	SPRINGFIELD, MO	2.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE	US&S	GREENVILLE	297 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Ft Mill SC	INDIAN LAND	297 FTE
STATE-SIZE	2832	HARDEEVILLE	296 FTE
STATE-SIZE	4664	CONWAY	296 FTE
CITY-NEAR	PRISMA HEALTH BAPTIST EASLEY MEDICAL CAMPUS	Easley	570 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Yokohama Industries Americas South Carolina, LLC	Easley	395 FTE
CITY-NEAR	BAPTIST EASLEY MED CAMPUS	Easley	386 FTE
CITY-NEAR	WM 631	Easley	319 FTE
NAT-TCR	Adc South 5035	Miami, FL	2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR	J.L. Fisher Inc.	Burbank, CA	2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR	Southeast Service Center	Norcross, GA	2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR	NFI Interactive Logistics LLC-300 Admiral Byrd Dr	Winchester, VA	2.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE	North America : Rialto	Rialto, CA	297 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Market Basket #87	Maynard, MA	297 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Mortex Products, Inc.	Fort Worth, TX	297 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Lockheed Martin Corporation US MA Marion Barnabas Rd (2448)	Marion, MA	297 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.