Private warehousing and storage, general merchandise · Georgia

Southeast Service Center

Norcross, GA · ~65 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
2.3
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Southeast Service Center runs at 40% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Private warehousing and storage, general merchandise workplace, earning a grade A.

Southeast Service Center: 2.3 TCR = 40% of Private warehousing and storage, general merchandise BLS 5.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Southeast Service Center safety composite

Southeast Service Center scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

69/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.31 per 100 workers

Safer than 67% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.1

2016→2023

Southeast Service Center injury rate improved

Southeast Service Center's TCR fell 3.1 from 3.1 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2021 at 6.6 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.1 · 2017=3.3 · 2018=1.6 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=2.4 · 2021=6.6 · 2022=1.5 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Norcross, GA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 2.3 · 40% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #225/506
  • PHOTO 30492 - CAPSTNOE MCL…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 14 inj
  • SIZE ~65 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 30492 - CAPSTNOE MCLANE WESTERN (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Southeast Service Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Southeast Service Center averages 2.3 TCR (40% of the Private warehousing and storage, general merchandise BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Southeast Service Center TCR series: 2016=3.1 · 2017=3.3 · 2018=1.6 · 2019=0 · 2020=2.4 · 2021=6.6 · 2022=1.5 · 2023=0 · BLS 5.8

Where Southeast Service Center falls in its industry

9,477 Private warehousing and storag establishments

Safer than 67% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #225 safest of 506 Private warehousing and storag employers in Georgia.

Southeast Service Center (65 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Southeast Service Center
Southeast Service Center (65 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Southeast Service Center has fewer employees than the Private warehousing and storage, general median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 1.5 1.5 1 0 0
2021 6.6 6.6 6 0 0
2020 2.4 1.2 2 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 1.6 0.0 1 0 0
2017 3.3 1.6 2 0 0
2016 3.1 3.1 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · GA · Norcross

9,477 Private warehousing and storage, general merchandise employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 337 employers in Norcross, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 30492 - CAPSTNOE MCLANE WESTERN 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR National Distribution Centers LLC-657 W NANCE ST 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Yokohama Chino Distribution Center 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR 1627 GEODIS LOGISTICS 2.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Columbia Farms of GA 65 FTE
STATE-SIZE Unlimited Contract Services - Lake City, FL 65 FTE
STATE-SIZE American Peanut Ingredients, LLC 65 FTE
STATE-SIZE C & E INVESTORS & CONSTRUCTION LLC 65 FTE
CITY-NEAR Home Office 1,234 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ole Mexican Foods, Norcross 6585 866 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6585 844 FTE
CITY-NEAR NAPA ATLANTA 794 FTE
NAT-TCR NFI Interactive Logistics LLC-300 Admiral Byrd Dr 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Adc South 5035 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR J.L. Fisher Inc. 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Filtration : Sylacauga 2.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Dayton Superior Corporation Rialto 65 FTE
NAT-SIZE St. Luke's Oregon Employees EOMA and Hearing and Balance 65 FTE
NAT-SIZE Interanational Paper North Kansas City 65 FTE
NAT-SIZE EDL Massman LLC 65 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.