Air-Condition and War Air Heating Equipment and Commercial and Industrial Refrigeration Equipment Manuf · Florida

Danfoss Turbocor LLC

Tallahassee, FL · ~278 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Danfoss Turbocor LLC runs at 54% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Air-Condition and War Air Heating Equipment and Commercial and Industrial Refrigeration Equipment Manuf workplace, earning a grade B.

Danfoss Turbocor LLC: 1.8 TCR = 54% of Air-Condition and War Air Heating Equipment and Commercial and Industrial Refrigeration Equipment Manuf BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Danfoss Turbocor LLC safety composite

Danfoss Turbocor LLC scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 68% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 38%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

53/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.78 per 100 workers

Safer than 68% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.05 per 100 workers

Safer than 38% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Danfoss Turbocor LLC: 1.5 → 2.0 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 2.0 TCR · DART/TCR 1.15× in 2024

Danfoss Turbocor LLC's TCR rose 0.5 from 1.5 in 2023 to 2.0 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.15× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333415 · Tallahassee, FL AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 1.8 · 54% of ind

  • DART 2.0 DART
  • RANK #8/20
  • PHOTO Thermo King of Tulsa…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~278 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Thermo King of Tulsa, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Danfoss Turbocor LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Danfoss Turbocor LLC averages 1.8 TCR (54% of the Air-Condition and War Air Heating Equipment and Commercial and Industrial Refrigeration Equipment Manuf BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Danfoss Turbocor LLC TCR series: 2023=1.5 · 2024=2 · BLS 3.3

Where Danfoss Turbocor LLC falls in its industry

461 Air-Condition and War Air Heat establishments

Safer than 68% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 20 Air-Condition and War Air Heat employers in Florida.

Danfoss Turbocor LLC (278 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 164 employees and a TCR of 2.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Danfoss Turbocor LLC
Danfoss Turbocor LLC (278 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 164 employees and a TCR of 2.8

Danfoss Turbocor LLC has more employees than the Air-Condition and War Air Heating Equipm median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.0 2.0 6 0 0
2023 1.5 0.0 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333415 · FL · Tallahassee

461 Air-Condition and War Air Heating Equipment and Commercial and Industrial Refrigeration Equipment Manuf employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 319 employers in Tallahassee, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Thermo King of Tulsa, LLC 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Stellar Energy Americas 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Daikin Applied - Faribault North 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Howell Laboratories Inc 1.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Mellick Group, LLC 278 FTE
STATE-SIZE FL - Miami - 5900 NW 72nd Ave - The American Bottling Company 278 FTE
STATE-SIZE Jacksonville Can 278 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hoerbiger Corporation of America 278 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tallahasse Memorial HealthCare 4,772 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - TLH2 2,080 FTE
CITY-NEAR HCA FLORIDA CAPITAL HOSPITAL 1,187 FTE
CITY-NEAR Capital Regional Medical Center 1,000 FTE
NAT-TCR Medical East 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Hillside Medical Lodge 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Cell Marque Corporation 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR FV Clinics-Lakeville 1.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Buckhorn Inc. 278 FTE
NAT-SIZE Jewish Community Center of San Francisco 278 FTE
NAT-SIZE Utogd - Ogden 278 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hyatt Regency Salt Lake City 278 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.