Community centers (except recreational only), youth · California

Jewish Community Center of San Francisco

San Francisco, CA · ~278 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.4
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Jewish Community Center of San Francisco runs at 62% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Community centers (except recreational only), youth workplace, earning a grade B.

Jewish Community Center of San Francisco: 2.4 TCR = 62% of Community centers (except recreational only), youth BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Jewish Community Center of San Francisco safety composite

Jewish Community Center of San Francisco scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 63% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 40%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

52/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.36 per 100 workers

Safer than 63% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.11 per 100 workers

Safer than 40% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.6

2021→2024

Jewish Community Center of San Francisco injury rate improved

Jewish Community Center of San Francisco's TCR fell 0.6 from 2.9 in 2021 to 2.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 2.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.47× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=2.9 · 2022=2.9 · 2023=1.5 · 2024=2.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 624110 · San Francisco, CA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.4 · 62% of ind

  • DART 1.1 DART
  • RANK #13/53
  • PHOTO ADMINISTRATION
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 16 inj
  • SIZE ~278 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: ADMINISTRATION (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Jewish Community Center of San Francisco in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Jewish Community Center of San Francisco averages 2.4 TCR (62% of the Community centers (except recreational only), youth BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Jewish Community Center of San Francisco TCR series: 2021=2.9 · 2022=2.9 · 2023=1.5 · 2024=2.2 · BLS 3.8

Where Jewish Community Center of San Francisco falls in its industry

328 Community centers (except recr establishments

Safer than 63% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #13 safest of 53 Community centers (except recr employers in California.

Jewish Community Center of San Francisco (278 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Jewish Community Center of San Francisco
Jewish Community Center of San Francisco (278 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Jewish Community Center of San Francisco has more employees than the Community centers (except recreational o median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.2 1.1 4 0 0
2023 1.5 0.5 3 0 0
2022 2.9 2.9 5 0 0
2021 2.9 2.9 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

624110 · CA · San Francisco

328 Community centers (except recreational only), youth employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,144 employers in San Francisco, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR ADMINISTRATION 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR HS Tulare Public CCS 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Child & Family Resources, Inc. 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR TreeHouse, Inc 2.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE NORTHEAST C&O - 1 278 FTE
STATE-SIZE NOVO Construction, Inc. 278 FTE
STATE-SIZE Performance Mechanical Inc. Pittsburg Area (Main Office) 278 FTE
STATE-SIZE Martinez Steel 278 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC San Francisco 18,070 FTE
CITY-NEAR DoorDash, Inc. 12,430 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC San Francisco Health 12,262 FTE
CITY-NEAR SFO - Airport United Airlines Offices 11,622 FTE
NAT-TCR Sub-Zero Built In 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR St. Paul 10180 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Harrell Milling Company, Inc 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR VCNA Prairie LLC 2.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Buckhorn Inc. 278 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hyatt Regency Salt Lake City 278 FTE
NAT-SIZE Utogd - Ogden 278 FTE
NAT-SIZE 134 Lansing Mi 278 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.