Elementary and secondary schools · South Carolina

Daniel Island School

Charleston, SC · ~128 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
3.0
Avg TCR
1.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Daniel Island School runs at 211% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Elementary and secondary schools workplace, earning a grade F.

Daniel Island School: 3.0 TCR = 211% of Elementary and secondary schools BLS 1.4 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Daniel Island School safety composite

Daniel Island School scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 62% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

55/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.95 per 100 workers

Safer than 62% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.2 per 100 workers

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.5

2018→2024

Daniel Island School injury rate improved

Daniel Island School's TCR fell 4.5 from 5.7 in 2018 to 1.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 6.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.41× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=5.7 · 2019=6.3 · 2020=1.2 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=3.8 · 2023=2.5 · 2024=1.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 611110 · Charleston, SC ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 3.0 · 211% of ind

  • DART 1.2 DART
  • RANK #40/129
  • PHOTO Harborview Elementary
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 15 inj
  • SIZE ~128 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Harborview Elementary (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Daniel Island School in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Daniel Island School averages 3.0 TCR (211% of the Elementary and secondary schools BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Daniel Island School TCR series: 2018=5.7 · 2019=6.3 · 2020=1.2 · 2021=0 · 2022=3.8 · 2023=2.5 · 2024=1.2 · BLS 1.4

Where Daniel Island School falls in its industry

3,374 Elementary and secondary schoo establishments

Safer than 62% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #40 safest of 129 Elementary and secondary schoo employers in South Carolina.

Daniel Island School (128 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 3.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,0008,00010,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Daniel Island School
Daniel Island School (128 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 3.8

Daniel Island School has more employees than the Elementary and secondary schools median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.2 1.2 1 0 0
2023 2.5 2.5 2 0 0
2022 3.8 2.5 3 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 1.2 1.2 1 0 0
2019 6.3 4.2 3 0 0
2018 5.7 3.4 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

611110 · SC · Charleston

3,374 Elementary and secondary schools employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 341 employers in Charleston, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Harborview Elementary 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mary S. Peak Elementary 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR ISD #162 Bagley Elementary School 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Metropolitan Learning Center 3.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE AME, INC. 128 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ace Gaffney 128 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fibertex Nonwovens Inc. - GRE 128 FTE
STATE-SIZE Innovative Construction Group, LLC-Florence, SC 128 FTE
CITY-NEAR Medical University Hospital Authority 8,204 FTE
CITY-NEAR Medical University of South Carolina 5,881 FTE
CITY-NEAR SC-03 4,525 FTE
CITY-NEAR SAFETY MANAGEMENT DIVISION 1,790 FTE
NAT-TCR BJB Architectural Metal Services 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR American Alloy Steel Inc Corporate 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Dooley Gasket and Seal, Inc. 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Burlington Gen Station 3.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE CRG Residential LLC 128 FTE
NAT-SIZE Niagara Bottling, LLC - Miami 128 FTE
NAT-SIZE Melbourne 128 FTE
NAT-SIZE Oral-B Laboratories G.P. Power Oral Care 128 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.