Grocery Store · South Carolina

Trader Joe's 0752 Mt. Pleasant

Mt. Pleasant, SC · ~128 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
19.3
Avg TCR
3.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Trader Joe's 0752 Mt. Pleasant runs at 569% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Grocery Store workplace, earning a grade F.

Trader Joe's 0752 Mt. Pleasant: 19.3 TCR = 569% of Grocery Store BLS 3.4 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Trader Joe's 0752 Mt. Pleasant safety composite

Trader Joe's 0752 Mt. Pleasant scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

15/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 19.34 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

DART rate
F 11.81 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Trader Joe's 0752 Mt. Pleasant: 18.4 → 22.7 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 38.0 TCR · DART/TCR 0.61× in 2024

Trader Joe's 0752 Mt. Pleasant's TCR rose 4.3 from 18.4 in 2017 to 22.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 38.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.61× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 445110 · Mt. Pleasant, SC ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 19.3 · 569% of ind

  • DART 11.8 DART
  • RANK #784/789
  • PHOTO 1136 Tul79
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 98 inj
  • SIZE ~128 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 1136 Tul79 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Trader Joe's 0752 Mt. Pleasant in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Trader Joe's 0752 Mt. Pleasant averages 19.3 TCR (569% of the Grocery Store BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Trader Joe's 0752 Mt. Pleasant TCR series: 2017=18.4 · 2018=8.4 · 2019=10.4 · 2020=18.3 · 2021=38 · 2022=16.3 · 2023=22.3 · 2024=22.7 · BLS 3.4

Where Trader Joe's 0752 Mt. Pleasant falls in its industry

30,654 Grocery Store establishments

Safer than 1% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #784 safest of 789 Grocery Store employers in South Carolina.

Trader Joe's 0752 Mt. Pleasant (128 employees, TCR 19.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 99 employees and a TCR of 4.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Trader Joe's 0752 Mt. Pleasant
Trader Joe's 0752 Mt. Pleasant (128 employees, TCR 19.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 99 employees and a TCR of 4.7

Trader Joe's 0752 Mt. Pleasant has more employees than the Grocery Store median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 22.7 11.8 23 2 0
2023 22.3 12.2 14 8 0
2022 16.3 12.0 10 5 0
2021 38.0 29.0 12 22 0
2020 18.3 12.6 12 4 0
2019 10.4 5.8 6 3 0
2018 8.4 4.8 7 0 0
2017 18.4 11.1 14 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

445110 · SC · Mt. Pleasant

30,654 Grocery Store employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 31 employers in Mt. Pleasant, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 1136 Tul79 19.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR North Richland Hills #126 19.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fort Worth-Tehama Ridge #137 19.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Trader Joe's 0604 Florham Park 19.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE AME, INC. 128 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ace Gaffney 128 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fibertex Nonwovens Inc. - GRE 128 FTE
STATE-SIZE Innovative Construction Group, LLC-Florence, SC 128 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wando Welch Terminal 454 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4701-345 440 FTE
CITY-NEAR Franke at Seaside 209 FTE
CITY-NEAR SCPA Headquarters 154 FTE
NAT-TCR Propak - Springfield, MO 19.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Continuing Healthcare of Lisbon 19.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Kre-Bsl Husky Split Rock Operation LLC 19.3 TCR
NAT-TCR NHC Healthcare Hendersonville 19.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Trader Joe's 0724 Bloomington 128 FTE
NAT-SIZE Trader Joe's 0178 Santa Rosa 128 FTE
NAT-SIZE Trader Joe's 0078 San Francisco 128 FTE
NAT-SIZE Trader Joe's 0041 San Luis Obispo 128 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.