Skilled nursing facilities · Indiana

Danville Regional Rehabiliation

Danville, IN · ~107 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
8.6
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Danville Regional Rehabiliation runs at 132% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Skilled nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

Danville Regional Rehabiliation: 8.6 TCR = 132% of Skilled nursing facilities BLS 6.5 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Danville Regional Rehabiliation safety composite

Danville Regional Rehabiliation scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 77% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 35%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

54/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 8.57 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

DART rate
B 1.1 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.3

2016→2021

Danville Regional Rehabiliation injury rate improved

Danville Regional Rehabiliation's TCR fell 5.3 from 8.6 in 2016 to 3.3 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2020 at 19.2 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.13× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=8.6 · 2017=7.3 · 2018=10.7 · 2019=2.2 · 2020=19.2 · 2021=3.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Danville, IN ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 8.6 · 132% of ind

  • DART 1.1 DART
  • RANK #433/640
  • PHOTO Medilodge of Montrose
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 28 inj
  • SIZE ~107 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Medilodge of Montrose (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Danville Regional Rehabiliation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Danville Regional Rehabiliation averages 8.6 TCR (132% of the Skilled nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Danville Regional Rehabiliation TCR series: 2016=8.6 · 2017=7.3 · 2018=10.7 · 2019=2.2 · 2020=19.2 · 2021=3.3 · BLS 6.5

Where Danville Regional Rehabiliation falls in its industry

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities establishments

Safer than 35% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #433 safest of 640 Skilled nursing facilities employers in Indiana.

Danville Regional Rehabiliation (107 employees, TCR 8.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Danville Regional Rehabiliation
Danville Regional Rehabiliation (107 employees, TCR 8.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Danville Regional Rehabiliation has more employees than the Skilled nursing facilities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 3.3 1.1 3 0 0
2020 19.2 13.9 1 17 0
2019 2.2 1.1 2 0 0
2018 10.7 9.5 9 0 0
2017 7.3 3.6 6 0 0
2016 8.6 4.9 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · IN · Danville

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 14 employers in Danville, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Medilodge of Montrose 8.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Embracing Autism 8.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Vista Post Acute 8.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Juniper Village at Lincoln Heights 8.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. Plymouth, IN 107 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2580-Remington, IN (Monsanto Co.) 107 FTE
STATE-SIZE Koetter Construction 107 FTE
STATE-SIZE Layne Christensen 1468 West Hospital Road 107 FTE
CITY-NEAR HENDRICKS REGIONAL HEALTH 2,076 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hendricks County Government 524 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 6476 271 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6476 257 FTE
NAT-TCR Enable Inc 8.6 TCR
NAT-TCR buybuy Baby Utica 8.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 094/NOV 8.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Promenade Health and Rehabilitation 8.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Universal Refractories, Inc 107 FTE
NAT-SIZE Custom Coolers, Inc. CA 107 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Arboretum VLC 107 FTE
NAT-SIZE The J.M. Smucker Company 107 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.