Public warehousing and storage (except self storage), general merchandise · California

Dart Warehouse Corporation

Los Angeles, CA · ~50 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
6.5
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Dart Warehouse Corporation runs at 113% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Public warehousing and storage (except self storage), general merchandise workplace, earning a grade C.

Dart Warehouse Corporation: 6.5 TCR = 113% of Public warehousing and storage (except self storage), general merchandise BLS 5.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Dart Warehouse Corporation safety composite

Dart Warehouse Corporation scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 4%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

23/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.54 per 100 workers

Safer than 22% of industry peers

DART rate
F 11.75 per 100 workers

Safer than 4% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Dart Warehouse Corporation: 0.0 → 11.8 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 18.1 TCR · DART/TCR 1.8× in 2022

Dart Warehouse Corporation's TCR rose 11.8 from 0.0 in 2017 to 11.8 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2020 at 18.1 TCR. In 2022, DART was 1.8× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Los Angeles, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 6.5 · 113% of ind

  • DART 11.8 DART
  • RANK #808/1131
  • PHOTO Shurtape- Oklahoma C…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 17 inj
  • SIZE ~50 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Shurtape- Oklahoma City, OK (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Dart Warehouse Corporation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Dart Warehouse Corporation averages 6.5 TCR (113% of the Public warehousing and storage (except self storage), general merchandise BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Dart Warehouse Corporation TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=2.4 · 2020=18.1 · 2021=7 · 2022=11.8 · BLS 5.8

Where Dart Warehouse Corporation falls in its industry

9,477 Public warehousing and storage establishments

Safer than 22% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #808 safest of 1131 Public warehousing and storage employers in California.

Dart Warehouse Corporation (50 employees, TCR 6.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Dart Warehouse Corporation
Dart Warehouse Corporation (50 employees, TCR 6.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Dart Warehouse Corporation has fewer employees than the Public warehousing and storage (except s median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 11.8 11.8 4 0 0
2021 7.0 7.0 4 0 0
2020 18.1 10.3 7 0 0
2019 2.4 0.0 2 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · CA · Los Angeles

9,477 Public warehousing and storage (except self storage), general merchandise employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 2,064 employers in Los Angeles, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Shurtape- Oklahoma City, OK 6.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 1911-19110010-001214 6.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR BURLINGTON NJ SALES CENTER 6.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR AMZL : DDC2 6.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Jack Bros., Inc. 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE M Three Ranches, LLC 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Penterman Farming Company 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Trefethen Farming, LLC 50 FTE
CITY-NEAR Live Nation Worldwide, Inc. 50,317 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC Los Angeles 40,333 FTE
CITY-NEAR LADWP 11,717 FTE
CITY-NEAR Los Angeles Department of Water and Power 10,346 FTE
NAT-TCR 5105 Hope Unique 6.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Prairie Lakes Healthcare-Food 6.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Easterseals - 171 Daniel Webster Hwy #2-Belmont 6.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 077722-Rifle Po 6.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Aspen Countertops, LLC 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tingley Rubber Corporation 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Manresa 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE HG129 50 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.