General Warehousing and Storage · Georgia

1911-19110010-001214

Buford, GA · ~303 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
6.5
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

1911-19110010-001214 runs at 113% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical General Warehousing and Storage workplace, earning a grade C.

1911-19110010-001214: 6.5 TCR = 113% of General Warehousing and Storage BLS 5.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

1911-19110010-001214 safety composite

1911-19110010-001214 scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 22%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

30/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.54 per 100 workers

Safer than 22% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.65 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.1

2016→2024

1911-19110010-001214 injury rate improved

1911-19110010-001214's TCR fell 2.1 from 6.8 in 2016 to 4.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 8.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.71× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=6.8 · 2017=3.0 · 2018=4.9 · 2019=8.1 · 2020=8.9 · 2021=7.7 · 2022=8.3 · 2024=4.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Buford, GA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 6.5 · 113% of ind

  • DART 4.7 DART
  • RANK #446/506
  • PHOTO Shurtape- Oklahoma C…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 139 inj
  • SIZE ~303 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Shurtape- Oklahoma City, OK (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

1911-19110010-001214 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 1911-19110010-001214 averages 6.5 TCR (113% of the General Warehousing and Storage BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

1911-19110010-001214 TCR series: 2016=6.8 · 2017=3 · 2018=4.9 · 2019=8.1 · 2020=8.9 · 2021=7.7 · 2022=8.3 · 2024=4.7 · BLS 5.8

Where 1911-19110010-001214 falls in its industry

9,477 General Warehousing and Storag establishments

Safer than 22% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #446 safest of 506 General Warehousing and Storag employers in Georgia.

1911-19110010-001214 (303 employees, TCR 6.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate 1911-19110010-001214
1911-19110010-001214 (303 employees, TCR 6.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

1911-19110010-001214 has more employees than the General Warehousing and Storage median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.7 4.7 8 1 0
2022 8.3 7.0 18 0 0
2021 7.7 7.3 18 0 0
2020 8.9 7.8 23 2 0
2019 8.1 6.8 18 0 0
2018 4.9 3.7 17 0 0
2017 3.0 2.2 11 0 0
2016 6.8 4.2 26 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · GA · Buford

9,477 General Warehousing and Storage employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 164 employers in Buford, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Shurtape- Oklahoma City, OK 6.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dart Warehouse Corporation 6.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR BURLINGTON NJ SALES CENTER 6.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR AMZL : DDC2 6.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Graydaze 303 FTE
STATE-SIZE International Paper, Port Wentworth Mill 303 FTE
STATE-SIZE KIK Custom Products / Voyant Beauty 303 FTE
STATE-SIZE CRRST - Central Garden Retail Merchandising 303 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tech Systems, Inc 478 FTE
CITY-NEAR Elringklinger USA, Inc. 473 FTE
CITY-NEAR GAORD - BUFORD CENTER 447 FTE
CITY-NEAR Georgia Branch 428 FTE
NAT-TCR 5114 - AZ ASPC Tucson - NaphCare AZ 6.5 TCR
NAT-TCR NG Schaumburg Reporting Center 6.5 TCR
NAT-TCR WEBASTO Roof Systems 6.5 TCR
NAT-TCR The KMBabiak Group 6.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Work, Community, Independence, Inc. 303 FTE
NAT-SIZE MCF-Rush City 303 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kansas City Hospice & Palliative Care Main Office 303 FTE
NAT-SIZE SC - Steering Columns 303 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.