Private warehousing and storage, general merchandise · New Jersey

David Yurman Enterprises LLC

Lyndhurst, NJ · ~145 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.5
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

David Yurman Enterprises LLC runs at 9% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Private warehousing and storage, general merchandise workplace, earning a grade A.

David Yurman Enterprises LLC: 0.5 TCR = 9% of Private warehousing and storage, general merchandise BLS 5.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

David Yurman Enterprises LLC safety composite

David Yurman Enterprises LLC scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 97% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

81/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.5 per 100 workers

Safer than 97% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.0

2021→2024

David Yurman Enterprises LLC injury rate improved

David Yurman Enterprises LLC's TCR fell 1.0 from 1.0 in 2021 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 1.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=1.0 · 2022=1.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Lyndhurst, NJ AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.5 · 9% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #17/333
  • PHOTO Kentwood DC
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~145 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Kentwood DC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

David Yurman Enterprises LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows David Yurman Enterprises LLC averages 0.5 TCR (9% of the Private warehousing and storage, general merchandise BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

David Yurman Enterprises LLC TCR series: 2021=1 · 2022=1 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 5.8

Where David Yurman Enterprises LLC falls in its industry

9,477 Private warehousing and storag establishments

Safer than 97% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #17 safest of 333 Private warehousing and storag employers in New Jersey.

David Yurman Enterprises LLC (145 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate David Yurman Enterprises LLC
David Yurman Enterprises LLC (145 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

David Yurman Enterprises LLC has more employees than the Private warehousing and storage, general median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 1.0 0.0 1 0 0
2021 1.0 1.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · NJ · Lyndhurst

9,477 Private warehousing and storage, general merchandise employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 38 employers in Lyndhurst, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Kentwood DC 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Schenker Inc. (P&G- Browns Summit 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 271 GLOG - GREENSBORO 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 1101 Enterprise Dr Royersford PA 0.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Pioneer Pipe Contractors, Inc. 145 FTE
STATE-SIZE Blue Anchor Manufacturing Facility - KNA 145 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cibao Meat Products Inc. 145 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sika Corporation - Corporate 145 FTE
CITY-NEAR NJLDH - LYNDHURST 410 FTE
CITY-NEAR ShopRite of Lyndhurst 300 FTE
CITY-NEAR Interstate Drywall Corp. 275 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sika - Lyndhurst 245 FTE
NAT-TCR Amerline Enterprises Co., Inc. 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Delta Air Lines - ATG - ADMIN 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR SBU Division office 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR QSI Carthage Mo 0.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Piedmont Aviation Component Services 145 FTE
NAT-SIZE Grunwell-Cashero Co 145 FTE
NAT-SIZE General Atomics - Poway - A31 145 FTE
NAT-SIZE Covenant Village of Green Township 145 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.