Power generation, nuclear electric · Ohio

Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station

Oak Harbor, OH · ~572 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Power generation, nuclear electric workplace, earning a grade C.

Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Power generation, nuclear electric BLS 1.2 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station safety composite

Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

76/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 66% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station held a steady TCR band

Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2020 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 0.0 TCR.

2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221113 · Oak Harbor, OH AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #0/4
  • PHOTO R.E. Ginna Nuclear P…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~572 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Power generation, nuclear electric BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station TCR series: 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 1.2

Where Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station falls in its industry

80 Power generation, nuclear elec establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 4 Power generation, nuclear elec employers in Ohio.

Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station (572 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 669 employees and a TCR of 0.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0123 Average employees Total Case Rate Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station
Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station (572 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 669 employees and a TCR of 0.2

Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station has fewer employees than the Power generation, nuclear electric median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221113 · OH · Oak Harbor

80 Power generation, nuclear electric employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 9 employers in Oak Harbor, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Exelon Nuclear Headquarters at Kennett Square 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Exelon Nuclear Headquarters at Cantera 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Perry Nuclear Power Plant 0.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Amherst Plant 572 FTE
STATE-SIZE AGC Automotive Americas 572 FTE
STATE-SIZE FedEx Supply Chain Philips Columbus 572 FTE
STATE-SIZE Little Tikes Hudson 571 FTE
CITY-NEAR Davis Besse 641 FTE
CITY-NEAR ACPO 181 FTE
CITY-NEAR Northern Manufacturing Co 151 FTE
CITY-NEAR NU 142 FTE
NAT-TCR Rogers Group, Inc 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Burrow Global Services, LLC 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 00525 North Temple Office 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Springhill Suites Houston Intercontinental AP 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Howmet Global Fasteners 572 FTE
NAT-SIZE 111 - Huntington Beach 572 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lear Corporation - Flint 572 FTE
NAT-SIZE City of Minnetonka 572 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.