Addition, alteration and renovation general contractors, commercial and institutional building · Washington

Dawson Construction Alaska

Bellingham, WA · ~56 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.5
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Dawson Construction Alaska runs at 189% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Addition, alteration and renovation general contractors, commercial and institutional building workplace, earning a grade D.

Dawson Construction Alaska: 5.5 TCR = 189% of Addition, alteration and renovation general contractors, commercial and institutional building BLS 2.9 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Dawson Construction Alaska safety composite

Dawson Construction Alaska scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 19%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

30/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.48 per 100 workers

Safer than 19% of industry peers

DART rate
F 1.98 per 100 workers

Safer than 28% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Dawson Construction Alaska: 5.0 → 5.9 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 5.9 TCR · DART/TCR 0.36× in 2018

Dawson Construction Alaska's TCR rose 0.9 from 5.0 in 2017 to 5.9 in 2018. In 2018, DART was 0.36× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Bellingham, WA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.5 · 189% of ind

  • DART 2.0 DART
  • RANK #88/127
  • PHOTO G.E. Johnson Constru…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~56 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: G.E. Johnson Construction Company (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Washington employers → · Look up another →

Dawson Construction Alaska in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Dawson Construction Alaska averages 5.5 TCR (189% of the Addition, alteration and renovation general contractors, commercial and institutional building BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Dawson Construction Alaska TCR series: 2017=5 · 2018=5.9 · BLS 2.9

Where Dawson Construction Alaska falls in its industry

4,692 Addition, alteration and renov establishments

Safer than 19% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Washington alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #88 safest of 127 Addition, alteration and renov employers in Washington.

Dawson Construction Alaska (56 employees, TCR 5.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Dawson Construction Alaska
Dawson Construction Alaska (56 employees, TCR 5.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Dawson Construction Alaska has more employees than the Addition, alteration and renovation gene median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 5.9 2.0 3 0 0
2017 5.0 0.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · WA · Bellingham

4,692 Addition, alteration and renovation general contractors, commercial and institutional building employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,147 rated employers in Washington with headcount on file · 210 employers in Bellingham, WA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR G.E. Johnson Construction Company 5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Oxford Design Build, LLC 5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Western Builders of Amarillo, Inc 5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Steadfast Structures, Inc. 5.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Norm Nelson, Inc. 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE Soli Organic Inc. - Washington 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE Yakima Chief Ranches 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE Admin Building 56 FTE
CITY-NEAR Western Washington University 3,794 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Joseph Medical Center Main Campus 2,537 FTE
CITY-NEAR North American Operations - Matrix Service Inc. 2,063 FTE
CITY-NEAR PHMG SJMC Clinics 864 FTE
NAT-TCR Standard Purification 5.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Miles City Montana 5.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Moly-Cop USA 5.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Sugar Foods Corporation 5.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Atmosphere Annealing LLC, Mt. Hope Facility 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE Roanoke Electric Cooperative 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE Shopko Store #64 (Nampa, ID) 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE R/W Connection, Inc. 56 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.