Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building · Colorado

G.E. Johnson Construction Company

Colorado Spring, CO · ~539 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.5
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

G.E. Johnson Construction Company runs at 189% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building workplace, earning a grade D.

G.E. Johnson Construction Company: 5.5 TCR = 189% of Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building BLS 2.9 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

G.E. Johnson Construction Company safety composite

G.E. Johnson Construction Company scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 8%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

23/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.49 per 100 workers

Safer than 19% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.35 per 100 workers

Safer than 8% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

G.E. Johnson Construction Company: 3.6 → 7.4 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 7.4 TCR · DART/TCR 0.97× in 2017

G.E. Johnson Construction Company's TCR rose 3.9 from 3.6 in 2016 to 7.4 in 2017. In 2017, DART was 0.97× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Colorado Spring, CO ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 5.5 · 189% of ind

  • DART 5.3 DART
  • RANK #122/148
  • PHOTO Hummel Construction …
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 64 inj
  • SIZE ~539 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Hummel Construction Co. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Colorado employers → · Look up another →

G.E. Johnson Construction Company in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows G.E. Johnson Construction Company averages 5.5 TCR (189% of the Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

G.E. Johnson Construction Company TCR series: 2016=3.6 · 2017=7.4 · BLS 2.9

Where G.E. Johnson Construction Company falls in its industry

4,692 Addition, alteration and renov establishments

Safer than 19% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Colorado alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #122 safest of 148 Addition, alteration and renov employers in Colorado.

G.E. Johnson Construction Company (539 employees, TCR 5.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate G.E. Johnson Construction Company
G.E. Johnson Construction Company (539 employees, TCR 5.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

G.E. Johnson Construction Company has more employees than the Addition, alteration and renovation for- median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 7.4 5.3 43 0 0
2016 3.6 2.7 21 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · CO · Colorado Spring

4,692 Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,007 rated employers in Colorado with headcount on file · 6 employers in Colorado Spring, CO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Hummel Construction Co. 5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR a.j. Veneklasen, Inc. 5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR JC Orr & Sons Inc 5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dawson Construction Alaska 5.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Republic National Distributing Company 4 537 FTE
STATE-SIZE Longs Peak Hospital 537 FTE
STATE-SIZE 802 542 FTE
STATE-SIZE CO - Virtual - C 543 FTE
CITY-NEAR MCHP CSO 859 FTE
CITY-NEAR Integrated Health Services at Colorado Springs 145 FTE
CITY-NEAR Colorado Springs 79 FTE
CITY-NEAR Colarelli Construction 41 FTE
NAT-TCR Main Office 5.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Longview (Txlon) 5.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Carnesville (Gacar) 5.5 TCR
NAT-TCR UG2 - 218 - Destiny USA 5.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Production 539 FTE
NAT-SIZE Los Angeles Airport Marriott 539 FTE
NAT-SIZE Headquarters 539 FTE
NAT-SIZE Oncor Electric Delivery Distribution Operations Western Region 539 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.