Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · North Carolina

Dayspring of Wallace

Wallace, NC · ~47 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.9
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Dayspring of Wallace runs at 181% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

Dayspring of Wallace: 6.9 TCR = 181% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Dayspring of Wallace safety composite

Dayspring of Wallace scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

63/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 6.87 per 100 workers

Safer than 52% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−8.3

2016→2024

Dayspring of Wallace injury rate improved

Dayspring of Wallace's TCR fell 8.3 from 8.3 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 12.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=8.3 · 2017=12.3 · 2018=12.2 · 2019=8.7 · 2020=7.3 · 2021=5.1 · 2022=7.8 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Wallace, NC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 6.9 · 181% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #209/356
  • PHOTO The Residence at Wat…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 25 inj
  • SIZE ~47 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: The Residence at Waterford Crossing (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Dayspring of Wallace in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Dayspring of Wallace averages 6.9 TCR (181% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Dayspring of Wallace TCR series: 2016=8.3 · 2017=12.3 · 2018=12.2 · 2019=8.7 · 2020=7.3 · 2021=5.1 · 2022=7.8 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Dayspring of Wallace falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 52% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #209 safest of 356 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in North Carolina.

Dayspring of Wallace (47 employees, TCR 6.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Dayspring of Wallace
Dayspring of Wallace (47 employees, TCR 6.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Dayspring of Wallace has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 7.8 2.6 3 0 0
2021 5.1 5.1 2 0 0
2020 7.3 0.0 0 3 0
2019 8.7 8.7 4 0 0
2018 12.2 8.2 6 0 0
2017 12.3 12.3 6 0 0
2016 8.3 8.3 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · NC · Wallace

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 11 employers in Wallace, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR The Residence at Waterford Crossing 6.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ivy Park at Cerritos 6.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR PSL-South Hill Village 6.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Farrington Court 6.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Monroe NC Operations 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dan River Steam Station 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hickory Resource Center PNG 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Smith Douglas Charlotte 47 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1352 219 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1352 218 FTE
CITY-NEAR PIGGLY WIGGLY #86 73 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wallace Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center 71 FTE
NAT-TCR 313011-Sanford | ME | SME-600 6.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 1787 LKQ West Sacramento 6.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Ivy Park at Cerritos 6.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 323 Transit LLC 6.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Advanced Modular Mfg. 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Westchester CHS 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Inverness at Spartanburg 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE University of Minnesota Health Clinics - EVS 47 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.