Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · South Carolina

Inverness at Spartanburg

Spartanburg, SC · ~47 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
13.7
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Inverness at Spartanburg runs at 361% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Inverness at Spartanburg: 13.7 TCR = 361% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Inverness at Spartanburg safety composite

Inverness at Spartanburg scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 15%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

26/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 13.72 per 100 workers

Safer than 15% of industry peers

DART rate
F 8.11 per 100 workers

Safer than 21% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Inverness at Spartanburg: 9.8 → 12.2 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 26.9 TCR · DART/TCR 0.59× in 2024

Inverness at Spartanburg's TCR rose 2.4 from 9.8 in 2016 to 12.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 26.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.59× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Spartanburg, SC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 13.7 · 361% of ind

  • DART 8.1 DART
  • RANK #91/107
  • PHOTO Artis Senior Living …
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 48 inj
  • SIZE ~47 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Artis Senior Living of Chestnut Ridge (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Inverness at Spartanburg in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Inverness at Spartanburg averages 13.7 TCR (361% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Inverness at Spartanburg TCR series: 2016=9.8 · 2017=9.7 · 2018=26.9 · 2019=14.1 · 2020=17.1 · 2021=18.8 · 2022=8.8 · 2023=6.1 · 2024=12.2 · BLS 3.8

Where Inverness at Spartanburg falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 15% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #91 safest of 107 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in South Carolina.

Inverness at Spartanburg (47 employees, TCR 13.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Inverness at Spartanburg
Inverness at Spartanburg (47 employees, TCR 13.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Inverness at Spartanburg has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 12.2 8.1 3 0 0
2023 6.1 6.1 2 0 0
2022 8.8 2.9 3 0 0
2021 18.8 8.0 7 0 0
2020 17.1 1.9 9 0 0
2019 14.1 1.8 8 0 0
2018 26.9 6.7 10 2 0
2017 9.7 3.2 3 0 0
2016 9.8 3.3 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · SC · Spartanburg

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 294 employers in Spartanburg, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Artis Senior Living of Chestnut Ridge 13.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Salem 13.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Myrtle Beach Grove Senior Living 13.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Mt. Hood 13.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE D.R. Horton, Inc. - Columbia 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE GE Healthcare 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fitts & Goodwin, Inc. 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Triangle Construction Co., Inc 47 FTE
CITY-NEAR SPARTANBURG FOOD 8,650 FTE
CITY-NEAR Spartanburg Medical Center 5,386 FTE
CITY-NEAR Spartanburg County 1,633 FTE
CITY-NEAR Spartanburg County Government 1,561 FTE
NAT-TCR Abilene South TX 13.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Brookdale Salem 13.7 TCR
NAT-TCR TW Ridley LLC 13.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Bella Terra Morton Grove 13.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE The Hermitage 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Springs of Catawba 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dayspring of Wallace 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Advanced Modular Mfg. 47 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.