Materials recovery facilities (MRF) · Ohio

Dayton Material Recovery Facility

Dayton, OH · ~34 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.6
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Dayton Material Recovery Facility runs at 291% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Materials recovery facilities (MRF) workplace, earning a grade F.

Dayton Material Recovery Facility: 7.6 TCR = 291% of Materials recovery facilities (MRF) BLS 2.6 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Dayton Material Recovery Facility safety composite

Dayton Material Recovery Facility scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 20%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

34/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.56 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3 per 100 workers

Safer than 38% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.1

2016→2023

Dayton Material Recovery Facility injury rate improved

Dayton Material Recovery Facility's TCR fell 4.1 from 13.1 in 2016 to 9.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2016 at 13.1 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.4× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=13.1 · 2017=7.9 · 2018=7.9 · 2019=5.8 · 2020=5.1 · 2021=2.7 · 2022=8.9 · 2023=9.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 562920 · Dayton, OH ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 7.6 · 291% of ind

  • DART 3.0 DART
  • RANK #15/17
  • PHOTO Plastic Recycling Inc.
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 23 inj
  • SIZE ~34 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Plastic Recycling Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Dayton Material Recovery Facility in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Dayton Material Recovery Facility averages 7.6 TCR (291% of the Materials recovery facilities (MRF) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Dayton Material Recovery Facility TCR series: 2016=13.1 · 2017=7.9 · 2018=7.9 · 2019=5.8 · 2020=5.1 · 2021=2.7 · 2022=8.9 · 2023=9 · BLS 2.6

Where Dayton Material Recovery Facility falls in its industry

422 Materials recovery facilities establishments

Safer than 20% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #15 safest of 17 Materials recovery facilities employers in Ohio.

Dayton Material Recovery Facility (34 employees, TCR 7.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 3.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Dayton Material Recovery Facility
Dayton Material Recovery Facility (34 employees, TCR 7.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 3.8

Dayton Material Recovery Facility has fewer employees than the Materials recovery facilities (MRF) median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 9.0 3.0 3 0 0
2022 8.9 8.9 3 0 0
2021 2.7 0.0 1 0 0
2020 5.1 2.6 2 0 0
2019 5.8 5.8 2 0 0
2018 7.9 2.6 3 0 0
2017 7.9 2.6 3 0 0
2016 13.1 8.7 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

562920 · OH · Dayton

422 Materials recovery facilities (MRF) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 599 employers in Dayton, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Plastic Recycling Inc. 7.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Agricultural Services, Inc. 7.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fremont Recycling & Transfer Station 7.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Indianapolis - 96th St 7.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bauman Orchards Inc. 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Millcreek Gardens LLC 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Meadow View Growers, Inc 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE ayers farms inc 34 FTE
CITY-NEAR Miami Valley Hospital 6,862 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Dayton 5,359 FTE
CITY-NEAR Dayton Children's Hospital 3,590 FTE
CITY-NEAR CareSource Management Services LLC 3,172 FTE
NAT-TCR New Orange Hills 7.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Brookdale North Boulder 7.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Prescott Lakes Golf Course 7.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 10406 Laguna Beach (WO) 7.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sc Sheet Metal, Inc. 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE United 378 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE United 362 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wilburton 34 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.