Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Maryland

(DBA Seaton Hagerstown)

Hagerstown, MD · ~42 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
18.1
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

(DBA Seaton Hagerstown) runs at 477% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

(DBA Seaton Hagerstown): 18.1 TCR = 477% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

(DBA Seaton Hagerstown) safety composite

(DBA Seaton Hagerstown) scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

16/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 18.13 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

DART rate
F 20.8 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

(DBA Seaton Hagerstown): 15.5 → 20.8 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 68.5 TCR · DART/TCR 1.15× in 2023

(DBA Seaton Hagerstown)'s TCR rose 5.3 from 15.5 in 2021 to 20.8 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 68.5 TCR. In 2023, DART was 1.15× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Hagerstown, MD ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 18.1 · 477% of ind

  • DART 20.8 DART
  • RANK #74/79
  • PHOTO Forestdale Park
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 16 inj
  • SIZE ~42 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Forestdale Park (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maryland employers → · Look up another →

(DBA Seaton Hagerstown) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows (DBA Seaton Hagerstown) averages 18.1 TCR (477% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

(DBA Seaton Hagerstown) TCR series: 2021=15.5 · 2022=68.5 · 2023=20.8 · BLS 3.8

Where (DBA Seaton Hagerstown) falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 7% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maryland alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #74 safest of 79 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Maryland.

(DBA Seaton Hagerstown) (42 employees, TCR 18.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate (DBA Seaton Hagerstown)
(DBA Seaton Hagerstown) (42 employees, TCR 18.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

(DBA Seaton Hagerstown) has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 20.8 20.8 6 1 0
2022 68.5 68.5 6 15 0
2021 15.5 15.5 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · MD · Hagerstown

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,213 rated employers in Maryland with headcount on file · 205 employers in Hagerstown, MD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Forestdale Park 18.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Keystone Villa at Ephrata 18.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sunrise Creek 18.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR KRE-BSL HUSKY BROOKFIELD OPERATION LLC 18.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Fort Meade 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE MDP Contracting, Inc. 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cuddy & Associates 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE OHLA USA INC-Purple Line Project, Maryland/MTS JV 42 FTE
CITY-NEAR Meritus Health 2,796 FTE
CITY-NEAR Meritus Medical Center 2,460 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6458-HAGE 1,921 FTE
CITY-NEAR Volvo Group Trucks Operations - Hagerstown, Maryland 1,592 FTE
NAT-TCR Manchester 18.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Hearth and Home at Vandalia 18.1 TCR
NAT-TCR North Oakland Enterprises LLC 18.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 190517-Atchison Po 18.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Foster Dairy Farms, Dairy #4 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1st American Management Co., Inc. 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE PA - Veritiv 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Deep South Crane & Rigging LLC @ ExxonMobil Complex Baton Rouge Louisiana 42 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.