Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Massachusetts

Forestdale Park

Malden, MA · ~68 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
18.1
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Forestdale Park runs at 477% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Forestdale Park: 18.1 TCR = 477% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Forestdale Park safety composite

Forestdale Park scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 5%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

17/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 18.13 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

DART rate
F 18.29 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Forestdale Park: 10.2 → 18.3 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 56.1 TCR · DART/TCR 1.01× in 2024

Forestdale Park's TCR rose 8.1 from 10.2 in 2018 to 18.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 56.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.01× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Malden, MA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 18.1 · 477% of ind

  • DART 18.3 DART
  • RANK #194/210
  • PHOTO (DBA Seaton Hagersto…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 34 inj
  • SIZE ~68 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: (DBA Seaton Hagerstown) (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

Forestdale Park in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Forestdale Park averages 18.1 TCR (477% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Forestdale Park TCR series: 2018=10.2 · 2019=14.2 · 2020=22.9 · 2021=20.2 · 2022=56.1 · 2023=23 · 2024=18.3 · BLS 3.8

Where Forestdale Park falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 7% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #194 safest of 210 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Massachusetts.

Forestdale Park (68 employees, TCR 18.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Forestdale Park
Forestdale Park (68 employees, TCR 18.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Forestdale Park has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 18.3 18.3 4 5 0
2023 23.0 23.0 3 8 0
2022 56.1 56.1 3 24 0
2021 20.2 20.2 4 5 0
2020 22.9 22.9 10 4 0
2019 14.2 14.2 6 0 0
2018 10.2 2.5 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · MA · Malden

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 40 employers in Malden, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR (DBA Seaton Hagerstown) 18.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Keystone Villa at Ephrata 18.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sunrise Creek 18.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR KRE-BSL HUSKY BROOKFIELD OPERATION LLC 18.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE BROCKTON - E ASHLAND ST BLDG-MA07 68 FTE
STATE-SIZE Perini Management Services, Inc. 68 FTE
STATE-SIZE Main Office 68 FTE
STATE-SIZE Maverick Construction Corp 68 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4459 Associated Home Care, LLC 579 FTE
CITY-NEAR Associated Home Care Location 7 567 FTE
CITY-NEAR Associated Home Care Location 8 369 FTE
CITY-NEAR Main Office - 01 325 FTE
NAT-TCR Stericycle - Concord,NC-4389 Republic 18.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Shiocton Cut Stock LLC 18.1 TCR
NAT-TCR California Institution for Men 18.1 TCR
NAT-TCR M&B Environmental, Inc. 18.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Nelson Wire & Steel 68 FTE
NAT-SIZE Stericycle - Concord,NC-4403 Republic 68 FTE
NAT-SIZE 215BIN 68 FTE
NAT-SIZE BAE Systems I&S - St. Marys 68 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.