General freight trucking, long-distance, less-than-truckload (LTL) · Georgia

Dcg - Costco College Park

College Park, GA · ~34 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
8.9
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Dcg - Costco College Park runs at 197% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical General freight trucking, long-distance, less-than-truckload (LTL) workplace, earning a grade D.

Dcg - Costco College Park: 8.9 TCR = 197% of General freight trucking, long-distance, less-than-truckload (LTL) BLS 4.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Dcg - Costco College Park safety composite

Dcg - Costco College Park scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 90% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 20%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

53/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.88 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers

DART rate
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 90% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−14.4

2022→2024

Dcg - Costco College Park injury rate improved

Dcg - Costco College Park's TCR fell 14.4 from 15.3 in 2022 to 0.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 15.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=15.3 · 2023=10.4 · 2024=0.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 484122 · College Park, GA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 8.9 · 197% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #95/113
  • PHOTO DA DAYTON
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~34 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: DA DAYTON (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Dcg - Costco College Park in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Dcg - Costco College Park averages 8.9 TCR (197% of the General freight trucking, long-distance, less-than-truckload (LTL) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Dcg - Costco College Park TCR series: 2022=15.3 · 2023=10.4 · 2024=0.9 · BLS 4.5

Where Dcg - Costco College Park falls in its industry

3,020 General freight trucking, long establishments

Safer than 20% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #95 safest of 113 General freight trucking, long employers in Georgia.

Dcg - Costco College Park (34 employees, TCR 8.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 5.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Dcg - Costco College Park
Dcg - Costco College Park (34 employees, TCR 8.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 5.6

Dcg - Costco College Park has fewer employees than the General freight trucking, long-distance, median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.9 0.0 1 0 0
2023 10.4 10.4 4 0 0
2022 15.3 15.3 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

484122 · GA · College Park

3,020 General freight trucking, long-distance, less-than-truckload (LTL) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 75 employers in College Park, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR DA DAYTON 8.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR 841 PHOENIX 8.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Elgin 128 8.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR 6284-YR-132 YT 8.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Total Timberland Services LLC 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Athens Business Office - 1001 Prince Ave. Athens 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Neese District Jackson EMC 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE JACKSON EMC - NEESE 34 FTE
CITY-NEAR COLLEGE PARK 9,165 FTE
CITY-NEAR Office of Field Operations - Atlanta 1,228 FTE
CITY-NEAR Golden Gate America East LLC. 954 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sysco Atlanta 811 FTE
NAT-TCR Quicksilver Express Courier of Missouri Inc 8.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Retro Environmental Inc (PA) 8.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Professional Reforestation of Oregon, Inc 8.9 TCR
NAT-TCR St. John's United - Billings Heights Wyndstone 8.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Cambridge Estate Investors, llc 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lakefield Veterinary Group - 151 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Terry's Colorado Home Supply 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Teledyne Electronic Safety Products 34 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.