Companion services for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities · Connecticut

DDS Central Office

Hartford, CT · ~114 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.2
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

DDS Central Office runs at 57% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Companion services for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities workplace, earning a grade B.

DDS Central Office: 2.2 TCR = 57% of Companion services for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

DDS Central Office safety composite

DDS Central Office scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

72/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.17 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.7

2018→2020

DDS Central Office injury rate improved

DDS Central Office's TCR fell 4.7 from 4.7 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2018 at 4.7 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=4.7 · 2019=1.8 · 2020=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 624120 · Hartford, CT AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.2 · 57% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #7/31
  • PHOTO Houlton Office
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~114 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Houlton Office (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Connecticut employers → · Look up another →

DDS Central Office in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows DDS Central Office averages 2.2 TCR (57% of the Companion services for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

DDS Central Office TCR series: 2018=4.7 · 2019=1.8 · 2020=0 · BLS 3.8

Where DDS Central Office falls in its industry

1,320 Companion services for disable establishments

Safer than 77% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Connecticut alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 31 Companion services for disable employers in Connecticut.

DDS Central Office (114 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate DDS Central Office
DDS Central Office (114 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.5

DDS Central Office has more employees than the Companion services for disabled persons, median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 1.8 1.8 2 0 0
2018 4.7 2.8 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

624120 · CT · Hartford

1,320 Companion services for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,008 rated employers in Connecticut with headcount on file · 270 employers in Hartford, CT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Houlton Office 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tulsa Plus 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Social Vocational Services 223 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR 310 Maple Avenue 2.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Trelleborg Coated Systems US, Inc. dba Uretek 114 FTE
STATE-SIZE Allnex-Wallingford 114 FTE
STATE-SIZE The Gilman Brothers Company 114 FTE
STATE-SIZE ELG Utica Alloys 114 FTE
CITY-NEAR HARTFORD HOSPITAL 7,842 FTE
CITY-NEAR Saint Francis Hospital 4,674 FTE
CITY-NEAR LAZ Parking California, LLC 4,117 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hartford-Saint Francis Hospital 3,165 FTE
NAT-TCR Advanced Composits Inc. 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Berkots Office/Warehouse 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Le Meridien Cambridge Hotel 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR ORMEC Systems Corp 2.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Alden of Waterford Rehab 114 FTE
NAT-SIZE TMI Trading Corp. 114 FTE
NAT-SIZE Eldercare Health and Rehabilitation 114 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mayer Electric Supply Company, Inc. - Birmingham 114 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.