HVAC (heating, ventilation and air-conditioning) contractors · California

Deal Mechanical, Inc.

Sacramento, CA · ~46 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.2
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Deal Mechanical, Inc. runs at 365% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical HVAC (heating, ventilation and air-conditioning) contractors workplace, earning a grade F.

Deal Mechanical, Inc.: 10.2 TCR = 365% of HVAC (heating, ventilation and air-conditioning) contractors BLS 2.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Deal Mechanical, Inc. safety composite

Deal Mechanical, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 10%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

33/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.21 per 100 workers

Safer than 10% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.59 per 100 workers

Safer than 45% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.9

2017→2024

Deal Mechanical, Inc. injury rate improved

Deal Mechanical, Inc.'s TCR fell 3.9 from 7.1 in 2017 to 3.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 14.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.16× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=7.1 · 2018=9.2 · 2020=12.9 · 2021=13.6 · 2022=14.6 · 2023=10.8 · 2024=3.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238220 · Sacramento, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 10.2 · 365% of ind

  • DART 1.6 DART
  • RANK #515/594
  • PHOTO Culligan - Minnetonka
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 32 inj
  • SIZE ~46 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Culligan - Minnetonka (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Deal Mechanical, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Deal Mechanical, Inc. averages 10.2 TCR (365% of the HVAC (heating, ventilation and air-conditioning) contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Deal Mechanical, Inc. TCR series: 2017=7.1 · 2018=9.2 · 2020=12.9 · 2021=13.6 · 2022=14.6 · 2023=10.8 · 2024=3.2 · BLS 2.8

Where Deal Mechanical, Inc. falls in its industry

5,793 HVAC (heating, ventilation and establishments

Safer than 10% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #515 safest of 594 HVAC (heating, ventilation and employers in California.

Deal Mechanical, Inc. (46 employees, TCR 10.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Deal Mechanical, Inc.
Deal Mechanical, Inc. (46 employees, TCR 10.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Deal Mechanical, Inc. has fewer employees than the HVAC (heating, ventilation and air-condi median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.2 1.6 2 0 0
2023 10.8 5.4 6 0 0
2022 14.6 11.4 9 0 0
2021 13.6 4.5 6 0 0
2020 12.9 3.2 4 0 0
2018 9.2 3.1 3 0 0
2017 7.1 7.1 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238220 · CA · Sacramento

5,793 HVAC (heating, ventilation and air-conditioning) contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,348 employers in Sacramento, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Culligan - Minnetonka 10.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Horizon Services - PA 10.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tacoma Plumbing & Heating, Inc. 10.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wade Heating, Cooling, and Refrigeration, LLC 10.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Matteoli Brothers 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE IMR Farms-San Miguel 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE G&G Berry Farms 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pitigliano Farm Services, Inc. 46 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC Davis Health 10,481 FTE
CITY-NEAR Employment Development Department 8,494 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 451 5,500 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 485 5,500 FTE
NAT-TCR Culligan - Minnetonka 10.2 TCR
NAT-TCR NPC South Inc. Plant 1 10.2 TCR
NAT-TCR E A Sween Company-Denver 7/11 10.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Harmon Overhead Door, Inc. 10.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Graetz Mfg Inc 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE 431 Perry Street 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hilton Garden Inn Yakima 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE Farmward - Morgan 46 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.