Bus operation, school and employee · Michigan

Dean Transportation, Inc. - Roscommon

Roscommon, MI · ~23 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.7
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Dean Transportation, Inc. - Roscommon runs at 238% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Bus operation, school and employee workplace, earning a grade F.

Dean Transportation, Inc. - Roscommon: 10.7 TCR = 238% of Bus operation, school and employee BLS 4.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Dean Transportation, Inc. - Roscommon safety composite

Dean Transportation, Inc. - Roscommon scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 83% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 7%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

44/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.7 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−8.3

2023→2024

Dean Transportation, Inc. - Roscommon injury rate improved

Dean Transportation, Inc. - Roscommon's TCR fell 8.3 from 14.9 in 2023 to 6.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 14.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2023=14.9 · 2024=6.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 485410 · Roscommon, MI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 10.7 · 238% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #71/74
  • PHOTO Maintenance and Oper…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~23 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Maintenance and Operations Department (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Dean Transportation, Inc. - Roscommon in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Dean Transportation, Inc. - Roscommon averages 10.7 TCR (238% of the Bus operation, school and employee BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Dean Transportation, Inc. - Roscommon TCR series: 2023=14.9 · 2024=6.5 · BLS 4.5

Where Dean Transportation, Inc. - Roscommon falls in its industry

1,574 Bus operation, school and empl establishments

Safer than 7% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #71 safest of 74 Bus operation, school and empl employers in Michigan.

Dean Transportation, Inc. - Roscommon (23 employees, TCR 10.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 4.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Dean Transportation, Inc. - Roscommon
Dean Transportation, Inc. - Roscommon (23 employees, TCR 10.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 4.3

Dean Transportation, Inc. - Roscommon has fewer employees than the Bus operation, school and employee median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.5 0.0 1 0 0
2023 14.9 14.9 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

485410 · MI · Roscommon

1,574 Bus operation, school and employee employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 7 employers in Roscommon, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Maintenance and Operations Department 10.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tumwater School District Transportation Facility 10.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Transportation 10.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR MSD Pike Township Transportation 10.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Black Gold Farms - MIS 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Casey Woodwyk, Inc. 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE John Schuring, Jr. Company 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Atwood Timber and Lumber 23 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lear Corporation - Roscommon 369 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Lighthouse at Roscommon 71 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mission Point of Roscommon 47 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1516 Family Fare -Roscommon, MI FF, LLC #38-2750461 34 FTE
NAT-TCR Wishe - Sheboygan 10.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Txang - Angleton 10.7 TCR
NAT-TCR d-7 Roofing LLC - Colo Spgs 10.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Intex Solutions, Inc. 10.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Oak Grove 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE North Andover-Haverhill-Ma29 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Unit Pack Co., Inc. 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1st FP Austin, LLC 23 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.