Ambulatory surgical centers and clinics, freestanding · Michigan

Dearborn Surgery Center LLC

Dearborn, MI · ~99 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.6
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Dearborn Surgery Center LLC runs at 121% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Ambulatory surgical centers and clinics, freestanding workplace, earning a grade D.

Dearborn Surgery Center LLC: 4.6 TCR = 121% of Ambulatory surgical centers and clinics, freestanding BLS 3.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Dearborn Surgery Center LLC safety composite

Dearborn Surgery Center LLC scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 70% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

62/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 4.6 per 100 workers

Safer than 63% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Dearborn Surgery Center LLC: 1.7 → 8.9 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 8.9 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

Dearborn Surgery Center LLC's TCR rose 7.2 from 1.7 in 2018 to 8.9 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621493 · Dearborn, MI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.6 · 121% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #11/29
  • PHOTO MG Ambulatory Care C…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 16 inj
  • SIZE ~99 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: MG Ambulatory Care Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Dearborn Surgery Center LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Dearborn Surgery Center LLC averages 4.6 TCR (121% of the Ambulatory surgical centers and clinics, freestanding BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Dearborn Surgery Center LLC TCR series: 2018=1.7 · 2019=3 · 2020=3.5 · 2021=0 · 2022=8.4 · 2023=6.7 · 2024=8.9 · BLS 3.8

Where Dearborn Surgery Center LLC falls in its industry

498 Ambulatory surgical centers an establishments

Safer than 63% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 29 Ambulatory surgical centers an employers in Michigan.

Dearborn Surgery Center LLC (99 employees, TCR 4.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 6.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Dearborn Surgery Center LLC
Dearborn Surgery Center LLC (99 employees, TCR 4.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 6.2

Dearborn Surgery Center LLC has more employees than the Ambulatory surgical centers and clinics, median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 8.9 0.0 6 0 0
2023 6.7 1.3 1 4 0
2022 8.4 0.0 6 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 3.5 0.0 0 2 0
2019 3.0 0.0 2 0 0
2018 1.7 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621493 · MI · Dearborn

498 Ambulatory surgical centers and clinics, freestanding employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 130 employers in Dearborn, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR MG Ambulatory Care Center 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Inova Ambulatory Surgery Center of Lorton 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Medical Associates East 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tri-State Urologic Services Inc. - Norwood 4.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Reichenbach Ceiling & Partition Co. 99 FTE
STATE-SIZE JD Candler Roofing Company 99 FTE
STATE-SIZE Weather Shield Roofing Systems, Inc. 99 FTE
STATE-SIZE TK Elevator Detroit 99 FTE
CITY-NEAR PDC - PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT CENTER TRUCK 20,749 FTE
CITY-NEAR Dearborn Truck Plant 5,037 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2250-1 4,185 FTE
CITY-NEAR PDC - PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT CENTER DESIGN 3,940 FTE
NAT-TCR Store 201 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Store 119 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 755 Oak80 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Apple Rehab Cromwell 4.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Ardent Mills Alton 99 FTE
NAT-SIZE 021 - Pinole Ca 99 FTE
NAT-SIZE Noble-X 99 FTE
NAT-SIZE Store 492 99 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.