Freestanding ambulatory surgical centers and clinics · Ohio

Tri-State Urologic Services Inc. - Norwood

Cincinnati, OH · ~110 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.6
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Tri-State Urologic Services Inc. - Norwood runs at 120% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Freestanding ambulatory surgical centers and clinics workplace, earning a grade D.

Tri-State Urologic Services Inc. - Norwood: 4.6 TCR = 120% of Freestanding ambulatory surgical centers and clinics BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Tri-State Urologic Services Inc. - Norwood safety composite

Tri-State Urologic Services Inc. - Norwood scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 70% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

63/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 4.57 per 100 workers

Safer than 64% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Tri-State Urologic Services Inc. - Norwood: 3.9 → 5.3 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 5.3 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2017

Tri-State Urologic Services Inc. - Norwood's TCR rose 1.4 from 3.9 in 2016 to 5.3 in 2017. In 2017, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621493 · Cincinnati, OH ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.6 · 120% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #5/9
  • PHOTO Medical Associates E…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~110 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Medical Associates East (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Tri-State Urologic Services Inc. - Norwood in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Tri-State Urologic Services Inc. - Norwood averages 4.6 TCR (120% of the Freestanding ambulatory surgical centers and clinics BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Tri-State Urologic Services Inc. - Norwood TCR series: 2016=3.9 · 2017=5.3 · BLS 3.8

Where Tri-State Urologic Services Inc. - Norwood falls in its industry

498 Freestanding ambulatory surgic establishments

Safer than 64% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 9 Freestanding ambulatory surgic employers in Ohio.

Tri-State Urologic Services Inc. - Norwood (110 employees, TCR 4.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 6.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Tri-State Urologic Services Inc. - Norwood
Tri-State Urologic Services Inc. - Norwood (110 employees, TCR 4.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 6.2

Tri-State Urologic Services Inc. - Norwood has more employees than the Freestanding ambulatory surgical centers median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 5.3 0.0 7 0 0
2016 3.9 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621493 · OH · Cincinnati

498 Freestanding ambulatory surgical centers and clinics employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 1,513 employers in Cincinnati, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Medical Associates East 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Inova Ambulatory Surgery Center of Lorton 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR MG Ambulatory Care Center 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dearborn Surgery Center LLC 4.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Quanex 110 FTE
STATE-SIZE Structural Systems Repair Group 110 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kelley Steel Erectors, Inc. 110 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ohio Heating & Refrigeration 110 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center 17,011 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cincinnati Operations 10,239 FTE
CITY-NEAR Supply Chain : Evendale, OH 7,118 FTE
CITY-NEAR Supply Chain Evendale OH 6,400 FTE
NAT-TCR 0014 - El Cajon, Ca 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Nazareth - BMW 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Giant Eagle #3188 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Residence - Nashville 4.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Gruber Technical, Inc 110 FTE
NAT-SIZE Avante at Reidsville 110 FTE
NAT-SIZE Burlington (Wabur) 110 FTE
NAT-SIZE Havelock (Nchav) 110 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.