Distribution line, sewer and water, construction · Colorado

DeFalco Construction Company

Longmont, CO · ~26 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.1
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

DeFalco Construction Company runs at 254% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Distribution line, sewer and water, construction workplace, earning a grade F.

DeFalco Construction Company: 7.1 TCR = 254% of Distribution line, sewer and water, construction BLS 2.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

DeFalco Construction Company safety composite

DeFalco Construction Company scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 13%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

24/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.12 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.34 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

DeFalco Construction Company: 0.0 → 21.7 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 21.7 TCR · DART/TCR 0.61× in 2024

DeFalco Construction Company's TCR rose 21.7 from 0.0 in 2017 to 21.7 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.61× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237110 · Longmont, CO ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 7.1 · 254% of ind

  • DART 4.3 DART
  • RANK #60/69
  • PHOTO Aqualis
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~26 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Aqualis (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Colorado employers → · Look up another →

DeFalco Construction Company in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows DeFalco Construction Company averages 7.1 TCR (254% of the Distribution line, sewer and water, construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

DeFalco Construction Company TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=12.5 · 2020=4.3 · 2021=9.2 · 2022=0 · 2023=9.2 · 2024=21.7 · BLS 2.8

Where DeFalco Construction Company falls in its industry

1,614 Distribution line, sewer and w establishments

Safer than 13% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Colorado alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #60 safest of 69 Distribution line, sewer and w employers in Colorado.

DeFalco Construction Company (26 employees, TCR 7.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate DeFalco Construction Company
DeFalco Construction Company (26 employees, TCR 7.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 3.0

DeFalco Construction Company has fewer employees than the Distribution line, sewer and water, cons median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 21.7 4.3 5 0 0
2023 9.2 9.2 2 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 9.2 0.0 2 0 0
2020 4.3 0.0 1 0 0
2019 12.5 12.5 3 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237110 · CO · Longmont

1,614 Distribution line, sewer and water, construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,007 rated employers in Colorado with headcount on file · 182 employers in Longmont, CO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Aqualis 7.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hill Construction Inc 7.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR G M Contracting, Inc. 7.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hydro Resources, MDC Dalhart 7.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Palmer Lake 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE BHE - Castle Rock (CO001) 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Glenwood Springs 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE 17W 26 FTE
CITY-NEAR Longmont, CO 1,167 FTE
CITY-NEAR Longmont United Hospital 638 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2643-05500001-055001 562 FTE
CITY-NEAR Longs Peak Hospital 537 FTE
NAT-TCR T & W Farms 7.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Rouses Market #33 7.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Anawalt Lumber-Robertson 7.1 TCR
NAT-TCR MAPEI Corporation 7.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Norman E. Day, Inc. 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mid-State Filigree Systems 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Acme Manufacturing 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wilson Case, Inc. 26 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.