Van conversion shops (except on assembly line or factory basis) · Maryland

Dejana Cargo and Van Interiors - Transit

Baltimore, MD · ~36 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.2
Avg TCR
2.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Dejana Cargo and Van Interiors - Transit runs at 59% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Van conversion shops (except on assembly line or factory basis) workplace, earning a grade B.

Dejana Cargo and Van Interiors - Transit: 1.2 TCR = 59% of Van conversion shops (except on assembly line or factory basis) BLS 2.1 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Dejana Cargo and Van Interiors - Transit safety composite

Dejana Cargo and Van Interiors - Transit scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

73/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.24 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.5

2022→2023

Dejana Cargo and Van Interiors - Transit injury rate improved

Dejana Cargo and Van Interiors - Transit's TCR fell 2.5 from 2.5 in 2022 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 2.5 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=2.5 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 811121 · Baltimore, MD AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.2 · 59% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/10
  • PHOTO Arlington
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~36 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Arlington (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maryland employers → · Look up another →

Dejana Cargo and Van Interiors - Transit in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Dejana Cargo and Van Interiors - Transit averages 1.2 TCR (59% of the Van conversion shops (except on assembly line or factory basis) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Dejana Cargo and Van Interiors - Transit TCR series: 2022=2.5 · 2023=0 · BLS 2.1

Where Dejana Cargo and Van Interiors - Transit falls in its industry

277 Van conversion shops (except o establishments

Safer than 87% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maryland alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 10 Van conversion shops (except o employers in Maryland.

Dejana Cargo and Van Interiors - Transit (36 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 3.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Dejana Cargo and Van Interiors - Transit
Dejana Cargo and Van Interiors - Transit (36 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 3.6

Dejana Cargo and Van Interiors - Transit has fewer employees than the Van conversion shops (except on assembly median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 2.5 2.5 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

811121 · MD · Baltimore

277 Van conversion shops (except on assembly line or factory basis) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,213 rated employers in Maryland with headcount on file · 1,031 employers in Baltimore, MD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Arlington 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Melbourne 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wyatt Johnson Auto Credit/ABRA of Clarksville 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Phenix City 1.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE ForwardGro, LLC 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE R.W. Sauder Inc. 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gibraltar Construction Co., Inc. 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE BOB BREEDING GENERAL CONTRACTORS, LLC 36 FTE
CITY-NEAR Johns Hopkins Hospital 12,523 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Maryland Medical Center 7,980 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sinai Hospital of Baltimore 7,770 FTE
CITY-NEAR NGMS-T340 6,180 FTE
NAT-TCR Saint Mary's Univ* 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Atlanta Airport Renaissasnce Gateway 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR OH - Alta / Pokemon 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Cactus Drilling Rig 142 1.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE American Red Cross - 113 W Park Dr 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE HB Specialty Foods Cookeville 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hawaii Petroleum, LLC.-Administration-Maui 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE PRC Industrial Supply 36 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.