Fruits, fresh, merchant wholesalers · California

Del Monte Fresh Produce LADC Santa Fe Springs

Santa Fe Springs, CA · ~27 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.0
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Del Monte Fresh Produce LADC Santa Fe Springs runs at 184% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Fruits, fresh, merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade D.

Del Monte Fresh Produce LADC Santa Fe Springs: 4.0 TCR = 184% of Fruits, fresh, merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Del Monte Fresh Produce LADC Santa Fe Springs safety composite

Del Monte Fresh Produce LADC Santa Fe Springs scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 89% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

69/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 4.05 per 100 workers

Safer than 62% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 89% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−8.1

2020→2023

Del Monte Fresh Produce LADC Santa Fe Springs injury rate improved

Del Monte Fresh Produce LADC Santa Fe Springs's TCR fell 8.1 from 8.1 in 2020 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2020 at 8.1 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=8.1 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 424480 · Santa Fe Springs, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.0 · 184% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #30/71
  • PHOTO Nogales Produce Inc.
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~27 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Nogales Produce Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Del Monte Fresh Produce LADC Santa Fe Springs in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Del Monte Fresh Produce LADC Santa Fe Springs averages 4.0 TCR (184% of the Fruits, fresh, merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Del Monte Fresh Produce LADC Santa Fe Springs TCR series: 2020=8.1 · 2023=0 · BLS 2.2

Where Del Monte Fresh Produce LADC Santa Fe Springs falls in its industry

369 Fruits, fresh, merchant wholes establishments

Safer than 62% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #30 safest of 71 Fruits, fresh, merchant wholes employers in California.

Del Monte Fresh Produce LADC Santa Fe Springs (27 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 83 employees and a TCR of 5.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Del Monte Fresh Produce LADC Santa Fe Springs
Del Monte Fresh Produce LADC Santa Fe Springs (27 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 83 employees and a TCR of 5.3

Del Monte Fresh Produce LADC Santa Fe Springs has fewer employees than the Fruits, fresh, merchant wholesalers median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 8.1 4.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

424480 · CA · Santa Fe Springs

369 Fruits, fresh, merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 310 employers in Santa Fe Springs, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Nogales Produce Inc. 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Calavo Clackamas 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Coosemans Tampa Inc 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR FreshEdge, LLC 4.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE HQ 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE Medeiros Farms Vineyards 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE SAND RANCH 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE San Bernabe Vineyards 27 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 423 3,217 FTE
CITY-NEAR CSI Electrical Contractors, Inc. 1,217 FTE
CITY-NEAR CSI 1,179 FTE
CITY-NEAR Vans Distribution Center - SFS 757 FTE
NAT-TCR Exhale Atlantic City 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Aviagen Turkeys Inc (ATI) 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Southern Operations Center 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR BWAY Sturtevant 4.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Rotom Inc. dba I.M.S. 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE New Harquahala Generating Company 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE RMX Freight Systems 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE SE Systems, Inc. Greensboro 27 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.