Warehousing (except farm products, general merchandise, refrigerated) · Michigan

Delaco Intergrated Terminals

Woodhaven, MI · ~77 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
8.6
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Delaco Intergrated Terminals runs at 148% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Warehousing (except farm products, general merchandise, refrigerated) workplace, earning a grade D.

Delaco Intergrated Terminals: 8.6 TCR = 148% of Warehousing (except farm products, general merchandise, refrigerated) BLS 5.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Delaco Intergrated Terminals safety composite

Delaco Intergrated Terminals scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 8%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

30/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.61 per 100 workers

Safer than 8% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.86 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Delaco Intergrated Terminals: 1.2 → 11.1 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 13.9 TCR · DART/TCR 0.22× in 2022

Delaco Intergrated Terminals's TCR rose 9.9 from 1.2 in 2016 to 11.1 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2020 at 13.9 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.22× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493190 · Woodhaven, MI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 8.6 · 148% of ind

  • DART 1.9 DART
  • RANK #15/16
  • PHOTO Portland Terminal
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 69 inj
  • SIZE ~77 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Portland Terminal (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Delaco Intergrated Terminals in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Delaco Intergrated Terminals averages 8.6 TCR (148% of the Warehousing (except farm products, general merchandise, refrigerated) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Delaco Intergrated Terminals TCR series: 2016=1.2 · 2018=0.2 · 2019=12.8 · 2020=13.9 · 2021=12.4 · 2022=11.1 · BLS 5.8

Where Delaco Intergrated Terminals falls in its industry

453 Warehousing (except farm produ establishments

Safer than 8% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #15 safest of 16 Warehousing (except farm produ employers in Michigan.

Delaco Intergrated Terminals (77 employees, TCR 8.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Delaco Intergrated Terminals
Delaco Intergrated Terminals (77 employees, TCR 8.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 2.7

Delaco Intergrated Terminals has more employees than the Warehousing (except farm products, gener median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 11.1 1.9 6 0 0
2021 12.4 4.5 11 0 0
2020 13.9 2.3 12 0 0
2019 12.8 1.0 13 0 0
2018 0.2 0.0 18 0 0
2016 1.2 0.1 9 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493190 · MI · Woodhaven

453 Warehousing (except farm products, general merchandise, refrigerated) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 33 employers in Woodhaven, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Portland Terminal 8.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Beretta USA - Distribution Warehouse 8.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sumner 3 8.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR 555 Remington, Bolingbrook, IL 8.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Chippewa County Road Commission 77 FTE
STATE-SIZE M&M Excavating Co., Inc. 77 FTE
STATE-SIZE Selge Construction Co., Inc. 77 FTE
STATE-SIZE C & R Electric - Main Office 77 FTE
CITY-NEAR WOODHVN STMP 456 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 3336 333 FTE
CITY-NEAR 3336 289 FTE
CITY-NEAR Meijer store 70 277 FTE
NAT-TCR Medicalodges Oxford 8.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 5472-NAI-0032-0032-00063 8.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 240079-Bos-Fort Point Sta 8.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 359606-Nyc-Cooper Sta 8.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Pate Construction Company Inc. 77 FTE
NAT-SIZE PSSI - 0560 Tyson Foods Inc. - Goodlettsville 77 FTE
NAT-SIZE PSSI - 0129 Tyson Foods Inc. - Madison 77 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Landing of North Haven 77 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.