Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · Connecticut

The Landing of North Haven

North Haven, CT · ~77 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
13.5
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Landing of North Haven runs at 356% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

The Landing of North Haven: 13.5 TCR = 356% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Landing of North Haven safety composite

The Landing of North Haven scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

20/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 13.51 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers

DART rate
F 23.42 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

The Landing of North Haven: 0.0 → 79.3 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 79.3 TCR · DART/TCR 5.43× in 2022

The Landing of North Haven's TCR rose 79.3 from 0.0 in 2019 to 79.3 in 2022. In 2022, DART was 5.43× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · North Haven, CT ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 13.5 · 356% of ind

  • DART 73.3 DART
  • RANK #31/43
  • PHOTO Myrtle Beach Estates
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 25 inj
  • SIZE ~77 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Myrtle Beach Estates (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Connecticut employers → · Look up another →

The Landing of North Haven in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Landing of North Haven averages 13.5 TCR (356% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Landing of North Haven TCR series: 2019=0 · 2020=51.8 · 2021=27 · 2022=79.3 · BLS 3.8

Where The Landing of North Haven falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 16% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Connecticut alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #31 safest of 43 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Connecticut.

The Landing of North Haven (77 employees, TCR 13.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate The Landing of North Haven
The Landing of North Haven (77 employees, TCR 13.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

The Landing of North Haven has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 79.3 73.3 17 36 0
2021 27.0 23.4 8 7 0
2020 51.8 49.7 0 25 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · CT · North Haven

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,008 rated employers in Connecticut with headcount on file · 95 employers in North Haven, CT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Myrtle Beach Estates 13.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wesley Des Moines 13.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Primrose Retirement Community of Gillette 13.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Lutheran Church Home of Buffalo, Inc. DBA GreenField Terrace 13.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Gilbane Building Company Glastonbury 77 FTE
STATE-SIZE Petra Construction Corp. 77 FTE
STATE-SIZE 122 River St 77 FTE
STATE-SIZE Greene Rubber Company 77 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - BDL3 4,773 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : BDL3 4,482 FTE
CITY-NEAR CT-01 4,429 FTE
CITY-NEAR Medtonic 2,818 FTE
NAT-TCR 5472-NAI-0032-0032-03338 13.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 6962-SWY-0029-0029-02724 13.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 6400-SWY-0020-0020-01972 13.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 6962-SWY-0025-0025-02455 13.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Nybsh - Farmingdale 77 FTE
NAT-SIZE NYBC-NJ 77 FTE
NAT-SIZE Villa Loretto 77 FTE
NAT-SIZE Delaco Intergrated Terminals 77 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.