Electric Power Distribution · Florida

Deland Operations and Fleet

Deland, FL · ~60 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
0.9
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Deland Operations and Fleet runs at 75% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Electric Power Distribution workplace, earning a grade B.

Deland Operations and Fleet: 0.9 TCR = 75% of Electric Power Distribution BLS 1.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Deland Operations and Fleet safety composite

Deland Operations and Fleet scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 85% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 45%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

63/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.9 per 100 workers

Safer than 85% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.29 per 100 workers

Safer than 45% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Deland Operations and Fleet: 1.6 → 2.6 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 2.6 TCR · DART/TCR 1.43× in 2024

Deland Operations and Fleet's TCR rose 1.0 from 1.6 in 2016 to 2.6 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.43× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221122 · Deland, FL AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 0.9 · 75% of ind

  • DART 1.3 DART
  • RANK #46/135
  • PHOTO Helena Service Center
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~60 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Helena Service Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Deland Operations and Fleet in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Deland Operations and Fleet averages 0.9 TCR (75% of the Electric Power Distribution BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Deland Operations and Fleet TCR series: 2016=1.6 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=1.9 · 2021=0 · 2022=2.1 · 2023=0 · 2024=2.6 · BLS 1.2

Where Deland Operations and Fleet falls in its industry

2,958 Electric Power Distribution establishments

Safer than 85% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #46 safest of 135 Electric Power Distribution employers in Florida.

Deland Operations and Fleet (60 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Deland Operations and Fleet
Deland Operations and Fleet (60 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Deland Operations and Fleet has more employees than the Electric Power Distribution median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.6 1.3 2 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 2.1 2.1 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 1.9 1.9 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 1.6 0.0 0 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221122 · FL · Deland

2,958 Electric Power Distribution employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 102 employers in Deland, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Helena Service Center 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Caniff Service Center 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR PARKLAND LIGHT & WATER 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Roughrider Electric Cooperative, Inc. 0.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bartow Combined Cycle Plant 60 FTE
STATE-SIZE PCC-Cape Canaveral Plant 60 FTE
STATE-SIZE BB1 Boynton Beach - S C Strm 60 FTE
STATE-SIZE Southern Customer Service 60 FTE
CITY-NEAR Florida Hospital DeLand 970 FTE
CITY-NEAR AdventHealth DeLand 941 FTE
CITY-NEAR d/b/a Boulevard Tire and Retread 555 FTE
CITY-NEAR KPR U.S., LLC 461 FTE
NAT-TCR BrandSafway LLC - Valero Refinery - Port Arthur 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Associate Mechanical Contractors 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Residence Inn Waldorf 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Swedish Covenant Hospital 0.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Stoneybrook Assisted Living 60 FTE
NAT-SIZE Public Works 60 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mittera Houston LLC 60 FTE
NAT-SIZE Globalize Solutions LLC 60 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.