Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation · California

Delta Energy Center

Pittsburg, CA · ~25 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.4
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Delta Energy Center runs at 37% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation workplace, earning a grade A.

Delta Energy Center: 0.4 TCR = 37% of Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation BLS 1.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Delta Energy Center safety composite

Delta Energy Center scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 91% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

74/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.44 per 100 workers

Safer than 91% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Delta Energy Center held a steady TCR band

Delta Energy Center's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 4.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=4.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221112 · Pittsburg, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.4 · 37% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #3/41
  • PHOTO Edwardsport IGCC
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~25 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Edwardsport IGCC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Delta Energy Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Delta Energy Center averages 0.4 TCR (37% of the Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Delta Energy Center TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=4 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 1.2

Where Delta Energy Center falls in its industry

846 Fossil Fuel Electric Power Gen establishments

Safer than 91% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 41 Fossil Fuel Electric Power Gen employers in California.

Delta Energy Center (25 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Delta Energy Center
Delta Energy Center (25 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5

Delta Energy Center has fewer employees than the Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 4.0 0.0 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221112 · CA · Pittsburg

846 Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 75 employers in Pittsburg, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Edwardsport IGCC 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Energy Transmission & Substation 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pawnee Station 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR FirstEnergy Generation Support Staff 0.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Conservation Farms Ranches 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE GM Ag Services, Inc. 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Farm Shop 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dougherty Brothers 25 FTE
CITY-NEAR USS POSCO INDUSTRIES, INC 601 FTE
CITY-NEAR USS UPI 549 FTE
CITY-NEAR Legacy Framers Inc. 441 FTE
CITY-NEAR Corteva Agriscience - Pittsburg Operations 290 FTE
NAT-TCR Leonard C. Carnaghi, Inc. 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR SDV Main Office 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Hi-Tech Wire, Inc. 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR BAE Systems Electronic Systems PTP 0.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Freestone Energy Center 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Corpus Christi Energy Center 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Magic Valley Generating Station 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tuscaloosa DZL 25 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.