Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation · Texas

Magic Valley Generating Station

Edinburg, TX · ~25 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
1.9
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Magic Valley Generating Station runs at 160% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation workplace, earning a grade D.

Magic Valley Generating Station: 1.9 TCR = 160% of Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation BLS 1.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Magic Valley Generating Station safety composite

Magic Valley Generating Station scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 71% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 37%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

52/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 1.92 per 100 workers

Safer than 37% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Magic Valley Generating Station held a steady TCR band

Magic Valley Generating Station's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 10.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=3.5 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=10.3 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=3.5 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221112 · Edinburg, TX ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 1.9 · 160% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #59/86
  • PHOTO Springerville Genera…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~25 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Springerville Generating Station (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Magic Valley Generating Station in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Magic Valley Generating Station averages 1.9 TCR (160% of the Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Magic Valley Generating Station TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=3.5 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=10.3 · 2021=0 · 2022=3.5 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 1.2

Where Magic Valley Generating Station falls in its industry

846 Fossil Fuel Electric Power Gen establishments

Safer than 37% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #59 safest of 86 Fossil Fuel Electric Power Gen employers in Texas.

Magic Valley Generating Station (25 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Magic Valley Generating Station
Magic Valley Generating Station (25 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5

Magic Valley Generating Station has fewer employees than the Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 3.5 3.5 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 10.3 10.3 1 2 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 3.5 3.5 1 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221112 · TX · Edinburg

846 Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 104 employers in Edinburg, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Springerville Generating Station 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR NCPA Combustion Turbine 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR A.S. King Plant 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR SHAWVILLE GENERATING STATION 1.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Village Farms of Monahans 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lubbock Feeders, LLC 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Circle Three Feed Yard, Ltd 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE SEABOARD FOODS LP 501-508 25 FTE
CITY-NEAR Doctors Hospital at Renaissance 4,521 FTE
CITY-NEAR U.S. Border Patrol Sector - Rio Grande Valley 3,315 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2576-157 743 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2576-21066000-21066 718 FTE
NAT-TCR United Initiators, Inc 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Gordon Terminal Service Co of PA 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR A113 Antech New York Lab 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 43 Crossways Park Drive 1.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Delta Energy Center 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tuscaloosa DZL 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tri County Foster Care 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Carroll Construction Supply - Des Moines 25 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.