Die-cut paper products (except for office use) made from purchased paper or paperboard · Massachusetts

Dennecrepe Incorporated

Gardner, MA · ~77 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Dennecrepe Incorporated runs at 183% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Die-cut paper products (except for office use) made from purchased paper or paperboard workplace, earning a grade D.

Dennecrepe Incorporated: 6.0 TCR = 183% of Die-cut paper products (except for office use) made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Dennecrepe Incorporated safety composite

Dennecrepe Incorporated scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 19%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

29/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.05 per 100 workers

Safer than 19% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.53 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Dennecrepe Incorporated: 2.9 → 3.5 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 12.8 TCR · DART/TCR 0.58× in 2024

Dennecrepe Incorporated's TCR rose 0.6 from 2.9 in 2016 to 3.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 12.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.58× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 322299 · Gardner, MA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 6.0 · 183% of ind

  • DART 3.5 DART
  • RANK #11/12
  • PHOTO Dallas RTS
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 26 inj
  • SIZE ~77 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Dallas RTS (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

Dennecrepe Incorporated in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Dennecrepe Incorporated averages 6.0 TCR (183% of the Die-cut paper products (except for office use) made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Dennecrepe Incorporated TCR series: 2016=2.9 · 2018=1.1 · 2019=12.8 · 2020=2.5 · 2021=10.7 · 2022=7.4 · 2023=7.4 · 2024=3.5 · BLS 3.3

Where Dennecrepe Incorporated falls in its industry

236 Die-cut paper products (except establishments

Safer than 19% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 12 Die-cut paper products (except employers in Massachusetts.

Dennecrepe Incorporated (77 employees, TCR 6.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Dennecrepe Incorporated
Dennecrepe Incorporated (77 employees, TCR 6.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Dennecrepe Incorporated has more employees than the Die-cut paper products (except for offic median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.5 3.5 2 0 0
2023 7.4 5.9 5 0 0
2022 7.4 4.9 3 0 0
2021 10.7 9.4 2 6 0
2020 2.5 2.5 2 0 0
2019 12.8 9.6 8 0 0
2018 1.1 1.1 1 0 0
2016 2.9 1.9 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

322299 · MA · Gardner

236 Die-cut paper products (except for office use) made from purchased paper or paperboard employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 37 employers in Gardner, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Dallas RTS 6.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kadant GranTek Inc. 6.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR CleanFiber Buffalo, LLC 6.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Charleroi RTS Packaging - F420 6.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE The Richmond Group Main Office 77 FTE
STATE-SIZE Chapman Construction/Design 77 FTE
STATE-SIZE G.V.W., Inc. 77 FTE
STATE-SIZE 5001 - Avon, MA 77 FTE
CITY-NEAR Heywood Hospital 1,092 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 2155 297 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2155 258 FTE
CITY-NEAR GVNA HealthCare Inc 167 FTE
NAT-TCR Great Lakes Cheese of New York, Inc. 6.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Pacheco and Associates II 6.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Store 130 6.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Central Transport - 861 861SH 6.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Marc Glassman Inc 53CF 77 FTE
NAT-SIZE Marc Glassman Inc 44SA 77 FTE
NAT-SIZE Franklin Pa 77 FTE
NAT-SIZE 2034 Coborn's Pipestone 77 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.