Public warehousing and storage, refrigerated · Pennsylvania

Denver Cold Storage, Inc.

Denver, PA · ~73 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
6.8
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Denver Cold Storage, Inc. runs at 117% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Public warehousing and storage, refrigerated workplace, earning a grade C.

Denver Cold Storage, Inc.: 6.8 TCR = 117% of Public warehousing and storage, refrigerated BLS 5.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Denver Cold Storage, Inc. safety composite

Denver Cold Storage, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 66% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 21%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

44/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.81 per 100 workers

Safer than 21% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.41 per 100 workers

Safer than 66% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.6

2016→2021

Denver Cold Storage, Inc. injury rate improved

Denver Cold Storage, Inc.'s TCR fell 2.6 from 5.5 in 2016 to 2.8 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2018 at 9.8 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.21× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=5.5 · 2017=6.8 · 2018=9.8 · 2019=9.2 · 2021=2.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493120 · Denver, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 6.8 · 117% of ind

  • DART 1.4 DART
  • RANK #41/52
  • PHOTO NewCold Burley Opera…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 25 inj
  • SIZE ~73 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: NewCold Burley Operations LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Denver Cold Storage, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Denver Cold Storage, Inc. averages 6.8 TCR (117% of the Public warehousing and storage, refrigerated BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Denver Cold Storage, Inc. TCR series: 2016=5.5 · 2017=6.8 · 2018=9.8 · 2019=9.2 · 2021=2.8 · BLS 5.8

Where Denver Cold Storage, Inc. falls in its industry

1,039 Public warehousing and storage establishments

Safer than 21% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #41 safest of 52 Public warehousing and storage employers in Pennsylvania.

Denver Cold Storage, Inc. (73 employees, TCR 6.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 68 employees and a TCR of 3.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Denver Cold Storage, Inc.
Denver Cold Storage, Inc. (73 employees, TCR 6.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 68 employees and a TCR of 3.9

Denver Cold Storage, Inc. has more employees than the Public warehousing and storage, refriger median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 2.8 1.4 2 0 0
2019 9.2 9.2 7 0 0
2018 9.8 7.0 7 0 0
2017 6.8 5.4 5 0 0
2016 5.5 4.1 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493120 · PA · Denver

1,039 Public warehousing and storage, refrigerated employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 44 employers in Denver, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR NewCold Burley Operations LLC 6.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hanson Cold Storage Co. of Indiana - Logansport 6.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Seattle - Michigan - PRW 6.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Agua Mansa - Sams 6.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE NRG Energy - Seward Generating Station 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE McMurray Operations 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE Philly Schuylkill 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wohlsen Construction Self Perform 73 FTE
CITY-NEAR SUPERVALU DISTRIBUTION CENTER - LANCASTER 38311 993 FTE
CITY-NEAR NAI-0034-0034-06655 FAC-06655-DENVER-PA 964 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pepperidge Farms, Denver 936 FTE
CITY-NEAR E00720-Pepperidge Farm Denver PA 912 FTE
NAT-TCR Nefab 6.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Castle Farms 6.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Swire Coca-Cola of Glenwood Springs 6.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Bowling Green 6.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Renaissance Roofing, Inc. 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE T-Rey Properties Inc. 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE Regency Senior Communities Brookfield 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE GRR-SAUSA 73 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.