Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · Wisconsin

Regency Senior Communities Brookfield

Brookfield, WI · ~73 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.7
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Regency Senior Communities Brookfield runs at 283% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Regency Senior Communities Brookfield: 10.7 TCR = 283% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Regency Senior Communities Brookfield safety composite

Regency Senior Communities Brookfield scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

24/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.74 per 100 workers

Safer than 26% of industry peers

DART rate
F 23.48 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Regency Senior Communities Brookfield: 4.5 → 25.6 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 25.6 TCR · DART/TCR 2.19× in 2021

Regency Senior Communities Brookfield's TCR rose 21.1 from 4.5 in 2016 to 25.6 in 2021. In 2021, DART was 2.19× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Brookfield, WI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 10.7 · 283% of ind

  • DART 23.5 DART
  • RANK #138/171
  • PHOTO Chateau At Sharmar V…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 24 inj
  • SIZE ~73 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Chateau At Sharmar Village (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Regency Senior Communities Brookfield in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Regency Senior Communities Brookfield averages 10.7 TCR (283% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Regency Senior Communities Brookfield TCR series: 2016=4.5 · 2017=14.9 · 2018=4.4 · 2020=4.3 · 2021=25.6 · BLS 3.8

Where Regency Senior Communities Brookfield falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 26% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #138 safest of 171 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Wisconsin.

Regency Senior Communities Brookfield (73 employees, TCR 10.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Regency Senior Communities Brookfield
Regency Senior Communities Brookfield (73 employees, TCR 10.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Regency Senior Communities Brookfield has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 25.6 23.5 12 0 0
2020 4.3 4.3 2 0 0
2018 4.4 0.0 1 1 0
2017 14.9 14.9 7 0 0
2016 4.5 4.5 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · WI · Brookfield

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 141 employers in Brookfield, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Chateau At Sharmar Village 10.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ashton Gardens 10.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR NY1532-BVSL-BV TARRYTOWN 10.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sinclair Place 10.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Scherrer Construction Co., INC 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE Iconica 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mashuda Contractors, Inc. 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE Statz & Harrop, Inc. 73 FTE
CITY-NEAR Milwaukee Tool Corporate 2,811 FTE
CITY-NEAR Milwaukee Electric Tool 1,263 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1855-WIMIL103 576 FTE
CITY-NEAR WIMIL103 ASCENSION SE WI - ELMBROOK CAMPUS 532 FTE
NAT-TCR Bernatello's Pizza, Inc 10.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Peregrine Senior Living 10.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Valley Manor 10.7 TCR
NAT-TCR MSD Pike Township Transportation 10.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Compu Dynamics LLC 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE Denver Cold Storage, Inc. 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE Renaissance Roofing, Inc. 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE T-Rey Properties Inc. 73 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.