City and town managers' offices · California

Department of General Services

West Sacramento, CA · ~3,631 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
6.5
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
1
Fatality
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Department of General Services runs at 204% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical City and town managers' offices workplace, earning a grade F.

Department of General Services: 6.5 TCR = 204% of City and town managers' offices BLS 3.2 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Department of General Services safety composite

Department of General Services scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 49% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

33/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 6.54 per 100 workers

Safer than 37% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.41 per 100 workers

Safer than 49% of industry peers

Fatalities
F 1

Safer than 3% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.0

2018→2024

Department of General Services injury rate improved

Department of General Services's TCR fell 5.0 from 8.1 in 2018 to 3.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 8.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.22× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=8.1 · 2019=8.3 · 2024=3.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 921110 · West Sacramento, CA ABOVE-IND · LARGE

Grade F · TCR 6.5 · 204% of ind

  • DART 1.4 DART
  • RANK #117/149
  • PHOTO City of Greensboro- …
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 663 inj
  • SIZE ~3,631 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: City of Greensboro- Finance (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Department of General Services in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Department of General Services averages 6.5 TCR (204% of the City and town managers' offices BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Department of General Services TCR series: 2018=8.1 · 2019=8.3 · 2024=3.1 · BLS 3.2

Where Department of General Services falls in its industry

1,010 City and town managers' office establishments

Safer than 37% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #117 safest of 149 City and town managers' office employers in California.

Department of General Services (3,631 employees, TCR 6.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Department of General Services
Department of General Services (3,631 employees, TCR 6.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 4.8

Department of General Services has more employees than the City and town managers' offices median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.1 1.4 48 70 0
2019 8.3 2.1 312 3 1
2018 8.1 1.8 303 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

921110 · CA · West Sacramento

1,010 City and town managers' offices employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 188 employers in West Sacramento, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR City of Greensboro- Finance 6.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Town of Litchfield 6.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR City of Bishop 6.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR City of Greensboro Parks and Recreation Department 6.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - SMF1 3,651 FTE
STATE-SIZE CHOC Children's Orange V2 3,652 FTE
STATE-SIZE PIH Health Hospital - Whittier 3,609 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1655 3rd St,San Francisco (MB3 3,658 FTE
CITY-NEAR HEADQUARTERS: COMBINED ADMINISTRATIVE UNITS 6,971 FTE
CITY-NEAR Administration 4,185 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 36 2,161 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 73 2,050 FTE
NAT-TCR University Park Terminal 6.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Andry Rasmussen & Sons 6.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Crown Moving & Storage, Inc 6.5 TCR
NAT-TCR The Food Co-op 6.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Chicago IL 3,636 FTE
NAT-SIZE Queens 3,642 FTE
NAT-SIZE BOS Logan Int'l Airport 3,642 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mary Imogene Bassett Hospital 3,617 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.