Trucking, general freight, local · Illinois

University Park Terminal

University Park, IL · ~201 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.5
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

University Park Terminal runs at 145% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Trucking, general freight, local workplace, earning a grade D.

University Park Terminal: 6.5 TCR = 145% of Trucking, general freight, local BLS 4.5 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

University Park Terminal safety composite

University Park Terminal scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 31%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

41/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.54 per 100 workers

Safer than 31% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.61 per 100 workers

Safer than 44% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.8

2016→2024

University Park Terminal injury rate improved

University Park Terminal's TCR fell 0.8 from 6.4 in 2016 to 5.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 11.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.55× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=6.4 · 2018=5.5 · 2019=7.3 · 2020=11.1 · 2021=4.7 · 2022=7.3 · 2023=4.5 · 2024=5.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 484110 · University Park, IL ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 6.5 · 145% of ind

  • DART 3.6 DART
  • RANK #111/161
  • PHOTO DENWL - CHIQUITA
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 112 inj
  • SIZE ~201 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: DENWL - CHIQUITA (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

University Park Terminal in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows University Park Terminal averages 6.5 TCR (145% of the Trucking, general freight, local BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

University Park Terminal TCR series: 2016=6.4 · 2018=5.5 · 2019=7.3 · 2020=11.1 · 2021=4.7 · 2022=7.3 · 2023=4.5 · 2024=5.6 · BLS 4.5

Where University Park Terminal falls in its industry

2,784 Trucking, general freight, loc establishments

Safer than 31% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #111 safest of 161 Trucking, general freight, loc employers in Illinois.

University Park Terminal (201 employees, TCR 6.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 4.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate University Park Terminal
University Park Terminal (201 employees, TCR 6.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 4.7

University Park Terminal has more employees than the Trucking, general freight, local median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.6 3.6 14 0 0
2023 4.5 2.6 12 0 0
2022 7.3 2.7 22 0 0
2021 4.7 3.0 11 0 0
2020 11.1 2.5 18 0 0
2019 7.3 3.0 12 0 0
2018 5.5 2.8 10 0 0
2016 6.4 3.5 13 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

484110 · IL · University Park

2,784 Trucking, general freight, local employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 49 employers in University Park, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR DENWL - CHIQUITA 6.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR KW INTERNATIONAL(GA_ELLENWOOD) 6.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hanke Trucking, Inc - Slinger 6.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR SCT of Ohio, Inc. 6.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE City of Chicago - CDOT, Main 2 201 FTE
STATE-SIZE Winpak Heat Seal Corporation 201 FTE
STATE-SIZE Flex-N-Gate Plastics 201 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2967-IL192 201 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - IGQ2 1,110 FTE
CITY-NEAR Federal Signal Corp (University Park) 490 FTE
CITY-NEAR Federal Signal Safety & Security Systems Group 454 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amex Nooter 407 FTE
NAT-TCR Department of General Services 6.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 972 Los Angeles 6.5 TCR
NAT-TCR RP National 6.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Crown Moving & Storage, Inc 6.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Water Pik, Inc. 201 FTE
NAT-SIZE Boston Gear 201 FTE
NAT-SIZE Amanda Manufacturing 201 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sunesis Construction Co. 201 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.