General public administration · California

Department of Homelessness and Supportive Housing

San Francisco, CA · ~55 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.4
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Department of Homelessness and Supportive Housing runs at 105% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical General public administration workplace, earning a grade C.

Department of Homelessness and Supportive Housing: 3.4 TCR = 105% of General public administration BLS 3.2 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Department of Homelessness and Supportive Housing safety composite

Department of Homelessness and Supportive Housing scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 61% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

55/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.35 per 100 workers

Safer than 61% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.67 per 100 workers

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Department of Homelessness and Supportive Housing: 3.4 → 270.5 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 270.5 TCR · DART/TCR 22.02× in 2019

Department of Homelessness and Supportive Housing's TCR rose 267.1 from 3.4 in 2017 to 270.5 in 2019. In 2019, DART was 22.02× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 921190 · San Francisco, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.4 · 105% of ind

  • DART 73.8 DART
  • RANK #94/256
  • PHOTO Parks and Recreation
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~55 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Parks and Recreation (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Department of Homelessness and Supportive Housing in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Department of Homelessness and Supportive Housing averages 3.4 TCR (105% of the General public administration BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Department of Homelessness and Supportive Housing TCR series: 2017=3.4 · 2019=270.5 · BLS 3.2

Where Department of Homelessness and Supportive Housing falls in its industry

1,496 General public administration establishments

Safer than 61% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #94 safest of 256 General public administration employers in California.

Department of Homelessness and Supportive Housing (55 employees, TCR 3.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 93 employees and a TCR of 4.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 010203040 Average employees Total Case Rate Department of Homelessness and Supportive Housing
Department of Homelessness and Supportive Housing (55 employees, TCR 3.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 93 employees and a TCR of 4.6

Department of Homelessness and Supportive Housing has fewer employees than the General public administration median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 270.5 73.8 6 5 0
2017 3.4 1.7 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

921190 · CA · San Francisco

1,496 General public administration employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,144 employers in San Francisco, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Parks and Recreation 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dept. of Administration (15) 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Employee Relations 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Gilliam County 3.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE FARMING ADMINISTRATION 55 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dwelley Family Farms LLC 55 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tri-Valley Vineyard Management 55 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cornerstone Certified Vineyard 55 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC San Francisco 18,070 FTE
CITY-NEAR DoorDash, Inc. 12,430 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC San Francisco Health 12,262 FTE
CITY-NEAR SFO - Airport United Airlines Offices 11,622 FTE
NAT-TCR Court Yard Area De Seguridad Y Proteccion Publica 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Kinzler Construction Services-CIA 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR R Williamson Construction, LLC 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Brightsmith LLC 3.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Quest Automated Services, LLC 55 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mohawk Resources, Ltd. 55 FTE
NAT-SIZE #180 Art Van Bolingbrook 55 FTE
NAT-SIZE Evansville DSH 55 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.