Centralized administrative offices · New York

DePaul Administration

Rochester, NY · ~82 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
3.5
Avg TCR
0.7
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

DePaul Administration runs at 499% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Centralized administrative offices workplace, earning a grade F.

DePaul Administration: 3.5 TCR = 499% of Centralized administrative offices BLS 0.7 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

DePaul Administration safety composite

DePaul Administration scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 69% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 11%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

41/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.49 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 69% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.0

2016→2024

DePaul Administration injury rate improved

DePaul Administration's TCR fell 1.0 from 1.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 11.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.0 · 2017=0.5 · 2018=8.3 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=2.1 · 2021=11.5 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=8.1 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 551114 · Rochester, NY ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 3.5 · 499% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #54/67
  • PHOTO L&L Headquarters - G…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~82 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: L&L Headquarters - Grand View (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

DePaul Administration in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows DePaul Administration averages 3.5 TCR (499% of the Centralized administrative offices BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

DePaul Administration TCR series: 2016=1 · 2017=0.5 · 2018=8.3 · 2019=0 · 2020=2.1 · 2021=11.5 · 2022=0 · 2023=8.1 · 2024=0 · BLS 0.7

Where DePaul Administration falls in its industry

1,475 Centralized administrative off establishments

Safer than 11% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #54 safest of 67 Centralized administrative off employers in New York.

DePaul Administration (82 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 189 employees and a TCR of 0.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate DePaul Administration
DePaul Administration (82 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 189 employees and a TCR of 0.7

DePaul Administration has fewer employees than the Centralized administrative offices median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 8.1 0.0 2 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 11.5 0.0 0 11 0
2020 2.1 0.0 0 2 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 8.3 2.8 1 2 0
2017 0.5 0.3 2 0 0
2016 1.0 1.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

551114 · NY · Rochester

1,475 Centralized administrative offices employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 956 employers in Rochester, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR L&L Headquarters - Grand View 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR ES3 LLC : ES3 York - Trans 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cranbury 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 6443-482051 3.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE ROSLYN-NY74 82 FTE
STATE-SIZE DiMarco Constructors 82 FTE
STATE-SIZE Montante Companies 82 FTE
STATE-SIZE Donnelly Construction Inc 82 FTE
CITY-NEAR Division 50 University of Rochester 13,244 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rochester General Hospital 7,833 FTE
CITY-NEAR Division 40 University of Rochester 4,884 FTE
CITY-NEAR Unity Hospital 3,158 FTE
NAT-TCR Dirt Cheap #533 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR The Lighthouse 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Prospect Airport Services MDW 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Northern General Contractors Inc 3.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE IMC Pocatello 82 FTE
NAT-SIZE Nikkei MC Aluminum America, Inc. 82 FTE
NAT-SIZE Concord Marketing Services 82 FTE
NAT-SIZE Grand Haven Custom Molding LLC 82 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.