Aluminum ingot, secondary, manufacturing · Indiana

Nikkei MC Aluminum America, Inc.

Columbus, IN · ~82 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Nikkei MC Aluminum America, Inc. runs at 118% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Aluminum ingot, secondary, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Nikkei MC Aluminum America, Inc.: 3.9 TCR = 118% of Aluminum ingot, secondary, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Nikkei MC Aluminum America, Inc. safety composite

Nikkei MC Aluminum America, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 60% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

57/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.89 per 100 workers

Safer than 57% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.97 per 100 workers

Safer than 60% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.6

2016→2024

Nikkei MC Aluminum America, Inc. injury rate improved

Nikkei MC Aluminum America, Inc.'s TCR fell 3.6 from 4.6 in 2016 to 1.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 6.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.25× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.6 · 2017=5.8 · 2018=6.6 · 2019=4.6 · 2020=5.3 · 2021=2.3 · 2023=1.0 · 2024=1.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 331314 · Columbus, IN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.9 · 118% of ind

  • DART 1.0 DART
  • RANK #3/14
  • PHOTO Real Alloy Recycling…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 23 inj
  • SIZE ~82 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Real Alloy Recycling, Inc. Morgantown, KY (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Nikkei MC Aluminum America, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Nikkei MC Aluminum America, Inc. averages 3.9 TCR (118% of the Aluminum ingot, secondary, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Nikkei MC Aluminum America, Inc. TCR series: 2016=4.6 · 2017=5.8 · 2018=6.6 · 2019=4.6 · 2020=5.3 · 2021=2.3 · 2023=1 · 2024=1 · BLS 3.3

Where Nikkei MC Aluminum America, Inc. falls in its industry

103 Aluminum ingot, secondary, man establishments

Safer than 57% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 14 Aluminum ingot, secondary, man employers in Indiana.

Nikkei MC Aluminum America, Inc. (82 employees, TCR 3.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 4.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Nikkei MC Aluminum America, Inc.
Nikkei MC Aluminum America, Inc. (82 employees, TCR 3.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 4.2

Nikkei MC Aluminum America, Inc. has more employees than the Aluminum ingot, secondary, manufacturing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.0 1.0 1 0 0
2023 1.0 1.0 1 0 0
2021 2.3 2.3 2 0 0
2020 5.3 3.5 3 0 0
2019 4.6 3.5 4 0 0
2018 6.6 6.6 3 1 0
2017 5.8 5.8 5 0 0
2016 4.6 3.5 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

331314 · IN · Columbus

103 Aluminum ingot, secondary, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 141 employers in Columbus, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Real Alloy Recycling, Inc. Morgantown, KY 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Eckart America Corporation 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Real Alloy Recycling, LLC.-Post Falls, ID 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Matalco Inc. 4.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sunny Side Farms 82 FTE
STATE-SIZE TK Elevator Indianapolis 82 FTE
STATE-SIZE ICC Floors 82 FTE
STATE-SIZE Allliance Sheets LLC 82 FTE
CITY-NEAR Toyota Material Handling, Inc. 1,961 FTE
CITY-NEAR NTN Driveshaft Inc. 1,756 FTE
CITY-NEAR Columbus Engine Plant 1,335 FTE
CITY-NEAR Commons Office Building 1,248 FTE
NAT-TCR Lezzer Butler 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Production Fabricators, Inc. 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Roanoke Gas Company 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Collinsville Healthcare and Rehabilitation 3.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Concord Marketing Services 82 FTE
NAT-SIZE Shawnee Colonial Estates 82 FTE
NAT-SIZE DePaul Administration 82 FTE
NAT-SIZE Batavia - 20104 82 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.