Lotions (e.g., body, face, hand) manufacturing · Connecticut

Dermatologic Cosmetic Laboratories, LTD

East Haven, CT · ~32 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Dermatologic Cosmetic Laboratories, LTD runs at 29% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Lotions (e.g., body, face, hand) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Dermatologic Cosmetic Laboratories, LTD: 1.0 TCR = 29% of Lotions (e.g., body, face, hand) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Dermatologic Cosmetic Laboratories, LTD safety composite

Dermatologic Cosmetic Laboratories, LTD scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

76/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.96 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.9

2016→2017

Dermatologic Cosmetic Laboratories, LTD injury rate improved

Dermatologic Cosmetic Laboratories, LTD's TCR fell 1.9 from 1.9 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2017. Peak filing year was 2016 at 1.9 TCR. In 2017, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.9 · 2017=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325620 · East Haven, CT AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.0 · 29% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #3/8
  • PHOTO New Avon LLC - Morto…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~32 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: New Avon LLC - Morton Grove (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Connecticut employers → · Look up another →

Dermatologic Cosmetic Laboratories, LTD in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Dermatologic Cosmetic Laboratories, LTD averages 1.0 TCR (29% of the Lotions (e.g., body, face, hand) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Dermatologic Cosmetic Laboratories, LTD TCR series: 2016=1.9 · 2017=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Dermatologic Cosmetic Laboratories, LTD falls in its industry

260 Lotions (e.g., body, face, han establishments

Safer than 82% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Connecticut alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 8 Lotions (e.g., body, face, han employers in Connecticut.

Dermatologic Cosmetic Laboratories, LTD (32 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 161 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Dermatologic Cosmetic Laboratories, LTD
Dermatologic Cosmetic Laboratories, LTD (32 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 161 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Dermatologic Cosmetic Laboratories, LTD has fewer employees than the Lotions (e.g., body, face, hand) manufac median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 1.9 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325620 · CT · East Haven

260 Lotions (e.g., body, face, hand) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,008 rated employers in Connecticut with headcount on file · 91 employers in East Haven, CT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR New Avon LLC - Morton Grove 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Nice-Pak Products 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR PLZ Corp 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Amcol Health & Beauty Solutions Inc 1.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Montville Power LLC 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Jacobs - WATERBURY - OMI 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE John Moriarty & Associates, Inc. (CT) 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE American Bridge Company - 422110 32 FTE
CITY-NEAR East Haven Markets LLC dba ShopRite of East Haven 252 FTE
CITY-NEAR East Haven Markets LLC 217 FTE
CITY-NEAR STOP & SHOP 100692 163 FTE
CITY-NEAR Apple Rehab Laurel Woods 158 FTE
NAT-TCR Siemens Energy Inc. - Mount Vernon 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 48- Ladd (Cattani) 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Beaumont District Office EN4T 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Glasgow 1.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Contour Construction 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Spring hill Farm Dairy Inc 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rai Mx Ord 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE 0052 - Everett, Wa 32 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.