Industry profile · NAICS 325620

Toilet preparations (e.g., cosmetics, deodorants, perfumes) manufacturing

Workplace injury rates across 275 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024.

275
Employers
3.2
Avg TCR
3.3
BLS benchmark
5,022
Injuries

The industry picture

Employers in Toilet preparations (e.g., cosmetics, deodorants, perfumes) manufacturing average 3.2 recordable injuries per 100 workers, below the BLS national benchmark of 3.3.

3.2
avg TCR · reporting employers
3.3
BLS national benchmark
275
employers reporting
5,022
recordable injuries

OSHA-reporting establishments skew toward larger, higher-hazard sites, so the reporting average runs above the BLS all-establishment benchmark.

What Toilet preparations (e.g., cosmetics, deodorants, perfumes) manufacturing Safety Data Reveals

The Toilet preparations (e.g., cosmetics, deodorants, perfumes) manufacturing sector (NAICS 325620) encompasses 275 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 5,022 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window, producing an industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 3.2 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year. Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 3.3 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 3.2 is below the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Toilet preparations (e.g., cosmetics, deodorants, perfumes) manufacturing that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 1 of 6
Employer LocationGradeAvg TCR
Motherlove Herbal Company Fort Collins, CO F 20.5
Prime Enterprises Group, LLC Miami Gardens, FL F 19.9
Goodkind Round Rock, TX F 17.7
VegeKurl Inc Glendale, CA F 14.4
W.S. Badger Co. Gilsum, NH F 13.1
Crabtree & Evelyn, Ltd Manufacturing Woodstock, CT F 12.0
Evergreen Innovations, LLC Minneapolis, MN F 11.9
Contract Filling Inc Cedar Grove, NJ F 11.3
Brickell Brands, LLC South Portland, ME F 11.2
Chae Manufacturing Walsenburg, CO F 11.2
Mane USA Wayne, NJ F 11.1
AFAM Concept. Inc Chicago, IL F 10.3
B&R Products LLC Miami, FL F 9.9
Cosmos Corporation Wentzville, MO F 9.5
Pharmco Laboratories Incorporated Titusville, FL F 8.7
Da Bomb LLC Edina, MN F 8.7
Earthly Body Chatsworth, CA F 7.9
Cosmetic Specialty Labs Inc Lawton, OK F 7.7
Miyoshi America Dayville, CT F 7.4
Developlus Inc Corona, CA F 7.1
ORLY International, Inc. Van Nuys, CA F 6.8
Merle Norman Cosmetics, Inc. Los Angeles, CA F 6.8
Marcy Laboratories West Chicago, IL D 6.6
Crabtree & Evelyn, Ltd Distribution Center Woodstock, CT D 6.5
PhytogenX Morgantown, PA D 6.3
B&R Corp. Miami, FL D 6.3
Cosmetix West El Segundo, CA D 6.3
Spatz Laboratories Oxnard, CA D 6.2
Dr. Bronner's Vista Plant Vista, CA D 6.1
Bright International, LLC Coolidge, AZ D 6.0
Colorado Quality Proudcts LLC Aurora, CO D 6.0
Lina Gale Inc. City of Industry, CA D 5.9
Bright International Corporation - Coolidge Coolidge, AZ D 5.8
Dhaliwal Labs North Bedford Park, IL D 5.8
Conair Corporation - Rantoul Rantoul, IL D 5.8
Function of Beauty Paxions, PA D 5.7
Levlad, LLC Chatsworth, CA D 5.7
Bell Flavors and Fragrances Middletown, NY D 5.5
Elevation Labs, Colorado Denver, CO D 5.2
Neoteric Cosmetics, Inc. Denver, CO D 5.0
Athea Packaging Milwaukee, WI D 5.0
Dhaliwal Labs Illinois LLC Bedford Park, IL D 5.0
Skylab Huntington Beach, CA D 4.9
Prime Enterprises Miami, FL D 4.9
Allure Labs, Inc. Hayward, CA D 4.8
Elkhart Main Elkhart, IN D 4.8
Northwest Cosmetics Idaho Falls, ID D 4.7
Countryside Countryside, IL D 4.7
Combe Laboratories Rantoul, IL D 4.7
Guest Supply LLC. (409 Kennedy Drive, Sayreville, NJ) Sayreville, NJ D 4.4
Page 1 of 6 Next →
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

Working in Toilet preparations (e.g., cosmetics, deodorants, perfumes) manufacturing?

This sector averages 3.2 against a BLS benchmark of 3.3 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.