Testing, weighing, inspecting, packaging machinery manufacturing · Alabama

DeShazo Automation LLC

Decatur, AL · ~56 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

DeShazo Automation LLC runs at 22% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Testing, weighing, inspecting, packaging machinery manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

DeShazo Automation LLC: 0.7 TCR = 22% of Testing, weighing, inspecting, packaging machinery manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

DeShazo Automation LLC safety composite

DeShazo Automation LLC scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 91% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 36%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

62/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.71 per 100 workers

Safer than 91% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.51 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

DeShazo Automation LLC: 0.0 → 1.5 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 4.2 TCR · DART/TCR 2.13× in 2023

DeShazo Automation LLC's TCR rose 1.5 from 0.0 in 2016 to 1.5 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2017 at 4.2 TCR. In 2023, DART was 2.13× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333993 · Decatur, AL AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.7 · 22% of ind

  • DART 1.5 DART
  • RANK #2/4
  • PHOTO Genesis
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~56 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Genesis (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Alabama employers → · Look up another →

DeShazo Automation LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows DeShazo Automation LLC averages 0.7 TCR (22% of the Testing, weighing, inspecting, packaging machinery manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

DeShazo Automation LLC TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=4.2 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=1.5 · BLS 3.3

Where DeShazo Automation LLC falls in its industry

269 Testing, weighing, inspecting, establishments

Safer than 91% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Alabama alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 4 Testing, weighing, inspecting, employers in Alabama.

DeShazo Automation LLC (56 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 2.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate DeShazo Automation LLC
DeShazo Automation LLC (56 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 2.4

DeShazo Automation LLC has fewer employees than the Testing, weighing, inspecting, packaging median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 1.5 1.5 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 4.2 4.2 2 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333993 · AL · Decatur

269 Testing, weighing, inspecting, packaging machinery manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,418 rated employers in Alabama with headcount on file · 239 employers in Decatur, AL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Genesis 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sealed Air Corporation 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dillin Engineered Systems Corp. 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Citation HealthCare Labels 0.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Marshall Dekalb Electric 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pelham, AL Office CS 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE Turner at Shell Chemical LP Saraland AL 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE SUMMIT ELECTRICAL CONSTRUCTION 56 FTE
CITY-NEAR Supply Chain - Decatur 1,450 FTE
CITY-NEAR Decatur processing plant 885 FTE
CITY-NEAR ULA-Decatur 701 FTE
CITY-NEAR Decatur Fresh Plant 671 FTE
NAT-TCR Roxboro Nc 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Southern Industrial Constructors 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Consumer Sales Solutions, LLC 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Coventry 0.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE ELCo Enterprises, Inc. 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE Richmond District Bridge Crews 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE Staunton District Bridge Crews 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gregory Poole Lift Systems- Chesapeake 56 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.