Trucking, general freight, long-distance, truckload (TL) · Michigan

Detroit / New Boston Terminal

New Boston, MI · ~332 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
2.1
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Detroit / New Boston Terminal runs at 47% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Trucking, general freight, long-distance, truckload (TL) workplace, earning a grade A.

Detroit / New Boston Terminal: 2.1 TCR = 47% of Trucking, general freight, long-distance, truckload (TL) BLS 4.5 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Detroit / New Boston Terminal safety composite

Detroit / New Boston Terminal scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 71% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 53%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

65/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.11 per 100 workers

Safer than 68% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.26 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.0

2021→2024

Detroit / New Boston Terminal injury rate improved

Detroit / New Boston Terminal's TCR fell 1.0 from 3.1 in 2021 to 2.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 3.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.12× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=3.1 · 2022=1.7 · 2023=1.6 · 2024=2.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 484121 · New Boston, MI AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 2.1 · 47% of ind

  • DART 0.3 DART
  • RANK #30/89
  • PHOTO Styline Logistics Mi…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 35 inj
  • SIZE ~332 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Styline Logistics Mississippi (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Detroit / New Boston Terminal in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Detroit / New Boston Terminal averages 2.1 TCR (47% of the Trucking, general freight, long-distance, truckload (TL) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Detroit / New Boston Terminal TCR series: 2021=3.1 · 2022=1.7 · 2023=1.6 · 2024=2.1 · BLS 4.5

Where Detroit / New Boston Terminal falls in its industry

3,252 Trucking, general freight, lon establishments

Safer than 68% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #30 safest of 89 Trucking, general freight, lon employers in Michigan.

Detroit / New Boston Terminal (332 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Detroit / New Boston Terminal
Detroit / New Boston Terminal (332 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Detroit / New Boston Terminal has more employees than the Trucking, general freight, long-distance median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.1 0.3 8 0 0
2023 1.6 0.9 7 0 0
2022 1.7 1.2 7 0 0
2021 3.1 1.7 13 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

484121 · MI · New Boston

3,252 Trucking, general freight, long-distance, truckload (TL) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 20 employers in New Boston, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Styline Logistics Mississippi 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Jurupa Valley Terminal 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Harrisonville Terminal 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR CBSL Transportation Services Pasadena 2.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Perrin, Inc. 332 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cooper Companies Inc. 332 FTE
STATE-SIZE Autocam Corporation 332 FTE
STATE-SIZE Avancez - Flint 332 FTE
CITY-NEAR Brose New Boston INC. 949 FTE
CITY-NEAR Plastic Omnium (Huron) 399 FTE
CITY-NEAR Huron 382 FTE
CITY-NEAR Plastic Omnium Huron 354 FTE
NAT-TCR Jurupa Valley Terminal 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Harrisonville Terminal 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Henrico Care Center LLC 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Clinton Engineering Company 2.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Fair Haven Retirement 332 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gift of Hope Organ & Tissue Donor Network 332 FTE
NAT-SIZE 11720 Providence 332 FTE
NAT-SIZE Chemoil Corporation 332 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.