General freight trucking, long-distance, truckload (TL) · California

Jurupa Valley Terminal

Jurupa Valley, CA · ~1,045 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
2.1
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
1
Fatality
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Jurupa Valley Terminal runs at 47% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical General freight trucking, long-distance, truckload (TL) workplace, earning a grade A.

Jurupa Valley Terminal: 2.1 TCR = 47% of General freight trucking, long-distance, truckload (TL) BLS 4.5 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Jurupa Valley Terminal safety composite

Jurupa Valley Terminal scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 68% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

49/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.11 per 100 workers

Safer than 68% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.35 per 100 workers

Safer than 61% of industry peers

Fatalities
F 1

Safer than 3% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Jurupa Valley Terminal: 1.2 → 3.5 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 3.5 TCR · DART/TCR 0.64× in 2024

Jurupa Valley Terminal's TCR rose 2.3 from 1.2 in 2020 to 3.5 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.64× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 484121 · Jurupa Valley, CA AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade A · TCR 2.1 · 47% of ind

  • DART 1.4 DART
  • RANK #81/218
  • PHOTO Styline Logistics Mi…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 136 inj
  • SIZE ~1,045 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Styline Logistics Mississippi (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Jurupa Valley Terminal in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Jurupa Valley Terminal averages 2.1 TCR (47% of the General freight trucking, long-distance, truckload (TL) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Jurupa Valley Terminal TCR series: 2020=1.2 · 2021=2.6 · 2022=1.9 · 2023=1.2 · 2024=3.5 · BLS 4.5

Where Jurupa Valley Terminal falls in its industry

3,252 General freight trucking, long establishments

Safer than 68% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #81 safest of 218 General freight trucking, long employers in California.

Jurupa Valley Terminal (1,045 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Jurupa Valley Terminal
Jurupa Valley Terminal (1,045 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Jurupa Valley Terminal has more employees than the General freight trucking, long-distance, median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.5 1.4 42 0 1
2023 1.2 1.0 16 0 0
2022 1.9 1.0 24 0 0
2021 2.6 1.9 37 0 0
2020 1.2 0.7 17 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

484121 · CA · Jurupa Valley

3,252 General freight trucking, long-distance, truckload (TL) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 49 employers in Jurupa Valley, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Styline Logistics Mississippi 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Detroit / New Boston Terminal 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Harrisonville Terminal 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR CBSL Transportation Services Pasadena 2.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - SMF5 1,045 FTE
STATE-SIZE SAN FERNANDO (CASFR) 1,045 FTE
STATE-SIZE LAGUNA HUB (CALAG) 1,044 FTE
STATE-SIZE 08880851 PANORAMA CITY MEDICAL CENTER 1,043 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - ONT1 776 FTE
CITY-NEAR Jurupa Valley, CA (Walmart) 432 476 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - BUR7 303 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pavement Recycling Systems, Inc. 279 FTE
NAT-TCR Detroit / New Boston Terminal 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Harrisonville Terminal 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Henrico Care Center LLC 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Clinton Engineering Company 2.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Avon Hospital 1,045 FTE
NAT-SIZE Devon Energy Corporate - OKC 1,045 FTE
NAT-SIZE SH - Building A 1,045 FTE
NAT-SIZE Washington DC 1,045 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.