Continuing care retirement communities · Ohio

Deupree House and Cottages

Cincinnati, OH · ~108 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.9
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Deupree House and Cottages runs at 51% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Continuing care retirement communities workplace, earning a grade B.

Deupree House and Cottages: 1.9 TCR = 51% of Continuing care retirement communities BLS 3.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Deupree House and Cottages safety composite

Deupree House and Cottages scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 93% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

69/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 1.93 per 100 workers

Safer than 93% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.02 per 100 workers

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Deupree House and Cottages held a steady TCR band

Deupree House and Cottages's TCR held near 0.2 from 2.8 in 2016 to 3.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 3.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.56× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.8 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=2.9 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=1.7 · 2022=1.6 · 2023=3.4 · 2024=3.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Cincinnati, OH AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 1.9 · 51% of ind

  • DART 3.0 DART
  • RANK #35/234
  • PHOTO Summerhouse Alexandria
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~108 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Summerhouse Alexandria (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Deupree House and Cottages in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Deupree House and Cottages averages 1.9 TCR (51% of the Continuing care retirement communities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Deupree House and Cottages TCR series: 2016=2.8 · 2018=0 · 2019=2.9 · 2020=0 · 2021=1.7 · 2022=1.6 · 2023=3.4 · 2024=3 · BLS 3.8

Where Deupree House and Cottages falls in its industry

4,127 Continuing care retirement com establishments

Safer than 93% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #35 safest of 234 Continuing care retirement com employers in Ohio.

Deupree House and Cottages (108 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Deupree House and Cottages
Deupree House and Cottages (108 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Deupree House and Cottages has more employees than the Continuing care retirement communities median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.0 3.0 2 0 0
2023 3.4 1.7 2 0 0
2022 1.6 0.0 1 0 0
2021 1.7 1.7 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 2.9 1.5 2 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 2.8 2.8 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · OH · Cincinnati

4,127 Continuing care retirement communities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 1,513 employers in Cincinnati, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Summerhouse Alexandria 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ecumen Pines 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR KINGSBURY PLACE 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brethren Home 1.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Central Egg Processing 108 FTE
STATE-SIZE LaRoche Tree Service, Inc. 108 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mielke Ohio 108 FTE
STATE-SIZE Decko Products, LLC 108 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center 17,011 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cincinnati Operations 10,239 FTE
CITY-NEAR Supply Chain : Evendale, OH 7,118 FTE
CITY-NEAR Supply Chain Evendale OH 6,400 FTE
NAT-TCR CenterPoint Energy - Columbus 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR FS Transportation, LLC 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Kci Inc Kcmo 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Rusk County Electric Cooperative 1.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE 70 Denver Truss 108 FTE
NAT-SIZE H&K Equipment 108 FTE
NAT-SIZE Port Lavaca Nursing and Rehabilitation Center 108 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sunoco Transportation Texas 108 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.