Distribution of electric power · Texas

Rusk County Electric Cooperative

Henderson, TX · ~70 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
1.9
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Rusk County Electric Cooperative runs at 161% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Distribution of electric power workplace, earning a grade D.

Rusk County Electric Cooperative: 1.9 TCR = 161% of Distribution of electric power BLS 1.2 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Rusk County Electric Cooperative safety composite

Rusk County Electric Cooperative scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

65/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.93 per 100 workers

Safer than 61% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Rusk County Electric Cooperative: 0.0 → 3.2 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 4.8 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

Rusk County Electric Cooperative's TCR rose 3.2 from 0.0 in 2016 to 3.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 4.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221122 · Henderson, TX ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 1.9 · 161% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #129/246
  • PHOTO NORTH DALLAS TRANSMI…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~70 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: NORTH DALLAS TRANSMISSION (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Rusk County Electric Cooperative in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Rusk County Electric Cooperative averages 1.9 TCR (161% of the Distribution of electric power BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Rusk County Electric Cooperative TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=1.4 · 2018=4.8 · 2019=0 · 2020=1.4 · 2021=3 · 2022=1.6 · 2024=3.2 · BLS 1.2

Where Rusk County Electric Cooperative falls in its industry

2,958 Distribution of electric power establishments

Safer than 61% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #129 safest of 246 Distribution of electric power employers in Texas.

Rusk County Electric Cooperative (70 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Rusk County Electric Cooperative
Rusk County Electric Cooperative (70 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Rusk County Electric Cooperative has more employees than the Distribution of electric power median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.2 0.0 2 0 0
2022 1.6 1.6 1 0 0
2021 3.0 1.5 2 0 0
2020 1.4 0.0 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 4.8 1.6 3 0 0
2017 1.4 1.4 1 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221122 · TX · Henderson

2,958 Distribution of electric power employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 41 employers in Henderson, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR NORTH DALLAS TRANSMISSION 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR United Electric Cooperative Services Burleson 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Snowflake 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Jacksonville Line and Service 1.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sales-OOS 70 FTE
STATE-SIZE Legacy Farms 70 FTE
STATE-SIZE GP 176/GP 178 70 FTE
STATE-SIZE San Angelo 1214 Gas Plant Rd, San Angelo, TX 76904 70 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sadler's Smokehouse 633 FTE
CITY-NEAR SBBQ Operations, LLC. dba Sadler's Smokehouse 496 FTE
CITY-NEAR Northeast Texas Home Health Agency LTD 467 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6808-0330 381 FTE
NAT-TCR 159-Renaissance Concourse Atlanta Airport 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 44-Melville Marriott Long Island 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR FS Transportation, LLC 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Deupree House and Cottages 1.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Field's Point Wastewater Treatment Facility 70 FTE
NAT-SIZE R+L Carriers - PRV 70 FTE
NAT-SIZE R+L Carriers - MUS 70 FTE
NAT-SIZE Innospec Active Chemicals, High Point 70 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.