Building materials supply dealers · Michigan

DeWitt Lumber Company - Mt. Pleasant

Mt. Pleasant, MI · ~32 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.2
Avg TCR
3.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

DeWitt Lumber Company - Mt. Pleasant runs at 123% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Building materials supply dealers workplace, earning a grade D.

DeWitt Lumber Company - Mt. Pleasant: 4.2 TCR = 123% of Building materials supply dealers BLS 3.4 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

DeWitt Lumber Company - Mt. Pleasant safety composite

DeWitt Lumber Company - Mt. Pleasant scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 60% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 23%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

45/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 4.18 per 100 workers

Safer than 60% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.61 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

DeWitt Lumber Company - Mt. Pleasant: 4.2 → 9.9 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 9.9 TCR · DART/TCR 1.58× in 2024

DeWitt Lumber Company - Mt. Pleasant's TCR rose 5.7 from 4.2 in 2016 to 9.9 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.58× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 444190 · Mt. Pleasant, MI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.2 · 123% of ind

  • DART 6.6 DART
  • RANK #27/54
  • PHOTO HWM - REDDING
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~32 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: HWM - REDDING (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

DeWitt Lumber Company - Mt. Pleasant in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows DeWitt Lumber Company - Mt. Pleasant averages 4.2 TCR (123% of the Building materials supply dealers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

DeWitt Lumber Company - Mt. Pleasant TCR series: 2016=4.2 · 2017=0 · 2018=7.5 · 2019=0 · 2020=3.1 · 2021=0 · 2022=3.1 · 2023=9.7 · 2024=9.9 · BLS 3.4

Where DeWitt Lumber Company - Mt. Pleasant falls in its industry

1,643 Building materials supply deal establishments

Safer than 60% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #27 safest of 54 Building materials supply deal employers in Michigan.

DeWitt Lumber Company - Mt. Pleasant (32 employees, TCR 4.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 35 employees and a TCR of 5.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate DeWitt Lumber Company - Mt. Pleasant
DeWitt Lumber Company - Mt. Pleasant (32 employees, TCR 4.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 35 employees and a TCR of 5.2

DeWitt Lumber Company - Mt. Pleasant has fewer employees than the Building materials supply dealers median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 9.9 6.6 3 0 0
2023 9.7 3.2 3 0 0
2022 3.1 3.1 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 3.1 0.0 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 7.5 7.5 2 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 4.2 4.2 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

444190 · MI · Mt. Pleasant

1,643 Building materials supply dealers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 42 employers in Mt. Pleasant, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR HWM - REDDING 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Congleton Lumber Co 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wbs - Green Bay Yard - Admin 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Darragh Company 4.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE 6801_15743 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Black Soil Dairy 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Berrybrook 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE East Tawas 32 FTE
CITY-NEAR Soaring Eagle Casino & Resort 2,199 FTE
CITY-NEAR McLaren Central Michigan 582 FTE
CITY-NEAR Delfield 463 FTE
CITY-NEAR J Ranck Electric, Inc. 298 FTE
NAT-TCR Littleton CO Millwork 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Grand Meadow 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR The Alfond Inn at Rollins 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Agri-Empresa Transportation - Midland 4.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Pt Washington MS 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wagner's, LLC - Milford 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mackey Lumber Co., Inc 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE PMC 32 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.