Support Activities for Air Transportation · Montana

DGS Aviation Services : GTF - Great Falls

Great Falls, MT · ~33 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
8.6
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

DGS Aviation Services : GTF - Great Falls runs at 191% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Support Activities for Air Transportation workplace, earning a grade D.

DGS Aviation Services : GTF - Great Falls: 8.6 TCR = 191% of Support Activities for Air Transportation BLS 4.5 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

DGS Aviation Services : GTF - Great Falls safety composite

DGS Aviation Services : GTF - Great Falls scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 85% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 19%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

50/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.59 per 100 workers

Safer than 19% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 85% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−8.7

2017→2020

DGS Aviation Services : GTF - Great Falls injury rate improved

DGS Aviation Services : GTF - Great Falls's TCR fell 8.7 from 8.7 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2018 at 18.6 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=8.7 · 2018=18.6 · 2019=7.0 · 2020=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 488119 · Great Falls, MT ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 8.6 · 191% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #8/11
  • PHOTO STL-SPUSA
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~33 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: STL-SPUSA (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Montana employers → · Look up another →

DGS Aviation Services : GTF - Great Falls in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows DGS Aviation Services : GTF - Great Falls averages 8.6 TCR (191% of the Support Activities for Air Transportation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

DGS Aviation Services : GTF - Great Falls TCR series: 2017=8.7 · 2018=18.6 · 2019=7 · 2020=0 · BLS 4.5

Where DGS Aviation Services : GTF - Great Falls falls in its industry

1,555 Support Activities for Air Tra establishments

Safer than 19% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Montana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 11 Support Activities for Air Tra employers in Montana.

DGS Aviation Services : GTF - Great Falls (33 employees, TCR 8.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate DGS Aviation Services : GTF - Great Falls
DGS Aviation Services : GTF - Great Falls (33 employees, TCR 8.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 4.5

DGS Aviation Services : GTF - Great Falls has fewer employees than the Support Activities for Air Transportatio median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 7.0 3.5 2 0 0
2018 18.6 18.6 6 0 0
2017 8.7 8.7 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

488119 · MT · Great Falls

1,555 Support Activities for Air Transportation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 1,536 rated employers in Montana with headcount on file · 121 employers in Great Falls, MT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR STL-SPUSA 8.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR PIT_UTILITY 8.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Unifi Aviation Services : LAX - Los Angeles 8.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR 6957-GRB 8.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Ak Drilling INC 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Construction 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Victory Equity Construction, LLC 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE US127: Helena 483 - SG 33 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2455 388 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 7199 341 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 2455 340 FTE
CITY-NEAR 7199 301 FTE
NAT-TCR Transportation Department 8.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Co 37 Maines Paper & Food Service, Inc. 8.6 TCR
NAT-TCR AmeriCare Plus - Charlottesville-Fishersville 8.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Faf Msp 8.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE DGS Aviation Services : OAJ - Jacksonville NC 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Engineered Materials : Millville 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Turner at AdvanSix Frankford PA 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1855-WIMIL73 33 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.